Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Angleterre : Slade titulaire, Ford remplaçant face aux All Blacks

Par AFP
Henry Slade sera le numéro 13 de l'équipe d'Angleterre lorsqu'elle affrontera les All Blacks samedi (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Henry Slade, qui vient de faire son retour en club après une opération à l’épaule, a été titularisé au centre de l’équipe d’Angleterre pour affronter la Nouvelle-Zélande samedi à Twickenham, premier match de la tournée européenne des All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT
Rencontre
Internationals
England
22 - 24
Temps complet
New Zealand
Toutes les stats et les données

Le joueur de 31 ans a fait sa première apparition de la saison lors de la défaite d’Exeter contre les Harlequins dimanche, disputant 55 minutes avant de sortir.

Sa performance a suffi à convaincre le sélectionneur Steve Borthwick de le préférer à Alex Lozowski au centre la ligne de trois-quarts anglaise.

Chandler Cunningham-South occupera quant à lui le poste de troisième-ligne aile, habituellement occupé par Ollie Chessum, blessé à un genou et très probablement forfait pour l’ensemble des test-matches de novembre.

Après avoir perdu deux fois de justesse en juillet dernier en Nouvelle-Zélande (16-15 et 24-17), l’Angleterre tentera de remporter sa première victoire contre les All Blacks à domicile depuis 2012.

Angleterre

XV de départ : Furbank – Feyi-Waboso, Slade, Lawrence, Freeman – (o) Smith, (m) Spencer – T. Curry, Earl, Cunningham-South – Martin, Itoje – Stuart, George (cap), Genge.

Remplaçants : Dan, Baxter, Cole, Isiekwe, B. Curry, Dombrandt, Randall, Ford.


ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 35 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

306 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search