Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Les nouvelles pas rassurantes de la blessure d'Antoine Dupont

Antoine Dupont, the France captain, receives treatment following head contact with Johan Deysel during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Pool A match between France and Namibia at Stade Velodrome on September 21, 2023 in Marseille, France. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Antoine Dupont, le capitaine de l’équipe de France, pourra-t-il terminer la Coupe du Monde de Rugby ? C’est l’inquiétude qui gagnait le jeudi 21 septembre au soir les travées du Stade de Marseille, le reste de la France et la planète rugby dans son ensemble.

ADVERTISEMENT

A la 45e minute, le talisman du XV de France quitte le terrain sur blessure. Sur les écrans géants du Stade de Marseille, les 63 000 spectateurs voient les images de la collision entre les deux capitaines des deux équipes.

Johan Deysel, le capitaine de la Namibie, percute violemment avec sa tête le visage d’Antoine Dupont. Deysel sortira sur carton jaune. Alerté, le bunker le transformera en rouge trois minutes plus tard.

En attendant, Antoine Dupont est soigné sur la pelouse. Les soins s’éternisent, puis Dupont sort en se tenant le visage. On ne le reverra plus.

Des nouvelles en conférence de presse

Quelques dizaines de minutes plus tard, le sélectionneur Fabien Galthié donne des nouvelles en conférence de presse. Pas très rassurantes.

« Pour l’instant, il est à l’hôpital, il passe des examens. Il y aurait une suspicion de fissure ou de fracture au niveau du maxillaire », annonce Galthié. Il gardera les yeux rivés sur son téléphone pendant toute la durée de la conférence de presse, mais n’aura pas d’autres nouvelles à donner.

« Quand un joueur se blesse, on n’est jamais heureux. On est toujours concernés. Effectivement, c’est pas la même chose que si il y avait eu zéro blessé », lâche-t-il. Les records de l’équipe de France qui sont tombés ce soir-là pèsent finalement peu.

Related

La question commence à se poser si, en menant 54-0 à la pause, il n’aurait pas fallu faire sortir Dupont pour le préserver.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Que voulez vous que je vous dise ? On ne peut pas sortir les 14 joueurs à ma mi-temps. Notre plan était de faire sortir le 1, 3, 5 à la mi-temps, puis le reste à la 55e. Le but était de faire jouer tout le monde pour prendre du temps de jeu et ne pas rester inactif pendant un mois. Les joueurs et cette équipe avaient envie et besoin de jouer », répond Fabien Galthié.

Des inquiétudes réelles

En zone mixte, les coéquipiers ne s’étendaient pas sur la blessure.

« On n’a pas de nouvelles. Il est parti passer des examens. On attend les résultats. J’espère que ça ne sera pas trop grave. Si c’était grave, ce serait forcément impactant pour lui et pour nous. On a quand même des numéros neuf d’expérience qui pourront prendre le relais », tentait de relativiser le troisième ligne aile François Cros.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search