Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Antoine Dupont : les JO après la Coupe du Monde ?

(Photo by Richard Heathcote/Getty Images)

Lors de la conférence annuelle des champions du Top 14 au début de la saison cette semaine, Didier Lacroix a abordé les informations selon lesquelles le Joueur World Rugby de l’année 2021 souhaite passer au format de rugby à sept après la Coupe du monde le mois prochain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Il n’est pas fréquent qu’un joueur ait l’occasion de disputer une Coupe du monde à domicile, mais il est encore plus rare qu’il ait l’occasion de disputer des Jeux olympiques à domicile. C’est un délai serré, mais comme Paris accueillera les Jeux en 2024, le joueur de 26 ans a l’occasion de faire les deux en l’espace de onze mois.

« Ce qui me paraît être gigantesque, c’est l’appétit d’Antoine Dupont. C’est la particularité de son degré d’insatisfaction permanente. Il est en appétit permanent », a expliqué le président du Stade Toulousain. « Antoine, ça fait des mois qu’il a évoqué, à sa façon, l’envie de jouer les JO. »

L’attention de Dupont se portera sur la prochaine Coupe du monde, où son équipe se présente comme l’un des favoris. Mais pour un joueur qui a remporté tout ce que le rugby a à offrir, à l’exception de la Webb Ellis Cup, il semble logique qu’il suive les traces de personnes comme Sonny Bill Williams et qu’il vise une médaille d’or olympique un an après la Coupe du monde. Après avoir remporté la Coupe du monde 2015 avec les All Blacks, Sonny Bill Williams avait tenté l’exploit aux Jeux olympiques de Rio, mais n’avait pas réussi.

« On a défini de façon très claire les contours de ce que pourrait être sa présence sur les JO. L’acteur principal, c’est Antoine Dupont. Le déclencheur du go / no go, c’est Antoine Dupont », rappelle Didier Lacroix.

« Et visiblement, il n’a pas envie de se dévoiler avant la Coupe du monde. Donc on a tout préparé, à tous les niveaux. J’espère qu’on n’a rien oublié. Mais c’est le joueur qui choisira. Et c’est normal. C’est une façon de respecter l’homme qu’il est, et de le laisser acteur de ses intentions, et de le préparer en conséquence. En fonction de sa décision, et du timing de sa décision, on s’adaptera. Et cela aura une incidence sur la saison en cours, et également sur l’année d’après puisqu’il y aura un temps de récupération.

« On est ouvert à la discussion. On l’accompagne dans son enthousiasme et dans ses ambitions. On sera prêt. Mais il n’y a rien de fait, rien de signé, rien de contractualisé. J’espère qu’il y aura de la place pour le bonheur qu’il prendra sur le terrain, et qu’il sera en forme pour pouvoir jouer les JO. Et s’il se retrouve aux Jeux, et qu’il permet au rugby de se développer et que ça lui permet de grandir, on sera les plus heureux pour lui. Mais cela reste dans le domaine de l’hypothèse. Et rien n’est arrêté aujourd’hui. »

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search