Édition du Nord
Select Edition
Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Arata se remet à temps de sa blessure pour jouer avec l'Uruguay

Santiago Arata, of Penarol, scored a vital try in Uruguay's Rugby World Cup win over Fiji. (Photo by Ken Ishii/Getty Images)

La sélection de l’Uruguay pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 regorge d’expérience en matière de tournoi, avec pas moins de huit joueurs prêts à se produire sur la plus grande scène du rugby au monde.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leur chef de file en France sera le centre de Vannes (Pro D2) Andrés Vilaseca, huit ans après que son frère aîné, Santiago, a été le capitaine de Los Teros à Angleterre 2015.

Le capitaine Vilaseca fait partie d’un groupe de huit joueurs prêts à participer à leur troisième Coupe du Monde de Rugby après avoir été appelé dans le groupe d’Esteban Meneses, tandis que 11 autres ont déjà un tournoi à leur actif.

Les avants Germán Kessler et Mateo Sanguinetti ainsi que l’ancien demi d’ouverture de Dax (Pro D2) Felipe Berchesi, le centre de Vannes (Pro D2) Nicolás Freitas et les arrières Gastón Mieres, Agustín Ormaechea et Rodrigo Silva ont tous représenté Los Teros lors des Coupes du Monde de Rugby 2015 et 2019.

Le demi de mêlée vedette Santiago Arata, qui évolue à Castres, a été retenu bien qu’il soit en France, se remettant d’une opération pour une blessure à la main subie à Montevideo pendant la préparation à la Coupe du Monde de Rugby. Il rejoindra l’équipe lorsqu’elle se rendra sur place.

Le deuxième ligne de Bayonne Manuel Leindekar sera également du voyage.

La sélection des «Teros», qui n’a jamais encore dépassé la phase de poules, est classée à la 17e place au classement World Rugby. Dans la Poule A, elle sera opposée à la France, pays-hôte, à la Nouvelle-Zélande, à la Namibie et à l’Italie.

ADVERTISEMENT

Avants : Mateo Sanguinetti, Matías Benitez, Facundo Gattas, Germán Kessler, Guillermo Pujadas, Ignacio Péculo, Diego Arbelo, Reinaldo Piussi, Ignacio Dotti, Manuel Leindekar, Felipe Aliaga, Manuel Ardao, Santiago Civetta, Manuel Diana, Lucas Bianchi, Carlos Deus, Juan Manuel Rodriguez, Eric Dos Santos.

Arrières : Santiago Arata, Santiago Alvarez, Agustín Ormaechea, Felipe Etcheverry, Felipe Berchesi, Andrés Vilaseca, Nicolás Freitas, Felipe Arcos Perez, Tomás Inciarte, Gastón Mieres, Baltazar Amaya, Juan Manuel Alonso, Rodrigo Silva, Bautista Basso, Ignacio Facciolo.

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 2 hours ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us