Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Caitlyn Halse - à 17 ans, elle est la plus jeune joueuse de l'histoire du rugby australien

SYDNEY, AUSTRALIE - 19 AVRIL : Caitlyn Halse des Waratahs est plaquée lors du match de demi-finale du Super Rugby féminin entre les NSW Waratahs et les ACT Brumbies à l'Allianz Stadium le 19 avril 2024 à Sydney, en Australie. (Photo par Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Caitlyn Halse est entrée dans l’histoire ce vendredi 17 mai, en devenant la plus jeune joueuse australienne de rugby à faire ses débuts en équipe nationale, masculine ou féminine.

ADVERTISEMENT

A 17 ans, 7 mois et 28 jours, l’arrière des Warathas – avec qui elle a remporté la saison 2024 début mai – a fait ses débuts internationaux avec les Wallaroos contre les États-Unis à Melbourne, dans le deuxième match des World Rugby Pacific Four Series.

Un record vieux de 30 ans

En entrant sur le terrain de l’AAMI Park, Caitlyn a fait tomber un record qui tenait depuis trente ans. Jusqu’alors, cet honneur revenait à l’ailière de Brisbane Sharyn Williams qui était la plus jeune joueuse des Wallaroos à avoir gagné sa seule et unique cape, lors d’un match contre la Nouvelle-Zélande à North Sydney alors qu’elle était âgée de 18 ans, 1 mois et 13 jours.

VOIR LE MATCH AUSTRALIE VS. USA SUR RUGBYPASS TV

Sharyn Williams était alors membre de la toute première équipe australienne féminine de rugby à XV – elle-même est considérée comme étant la 11e joueuse de l’histoire.

Près de 30 ans plus tard, la suite est assurée par Caitlyn Halse, née le 18 septembre 2006, qui était déjà la plus jeune joueuse dans le Super Rugby en 2023 alors qu’elle n’avait que 16 ans et 187 jours lorsqu’elle a disputé son premier match. Mais qu’est-ce qui lui a permis d’être au plus haut niveau si jeune ?

Elle a commencé à 6 ans

Caitlyn a commencé à jouer au rugby dès l’âge de 6 ans. D’abord au format à XIII avec les Picton Magpies, puis deux ans plus tard à XV avec les Camden Rams. En fait, après avoir vu son père et ses oncles jouer au rugby, elle a toujours voulu faire pareil.

« J’avais l’habitude de dormir avec mon ballon et mes chaussures tous les soirs », a-t-elle raconté au Sydney Morning Herald. Sauf qu’en face les garçons ne voulaient pas jouer contre elle.

« La plupart des garçons ne voulaient pas me plaquer ou jouer avec une fille, alors maman mettait ma tresse dans mon casque.

« Je jouais et je l’enlevais après le match. Tous les garçons étaient surpris quand ils réalisaient qu’ils venaient de jouer contre une fille. »

ADVERTISEMENT

Avec son père qui lui sert de chauffeur, Caitlyn, qui est toujours scolarisée au Magdalene Catholic College dans le sud-ouest de Sydney, met près d’une heure et demie pour aller à l’entraînement de son club plusieurs fois par semaine.

« J’aime non seulement l’environnement de l’équipe, mais aussi l’engagement physique du rugby. C’est tellement différent de tout le reste », dit celle qui a arrêté de jouer avec les garçons à 13 ans pour intégrer pour la première fois une équipe féminine à 14 ans.

C’est là qu’elle reconnaît avoir eu une révélation de son potentiel et que, un jour peut-être, elle deviendrait internationale pour l’Australie.

Un rêve réalisé

Apparue sur la scène du Super Rugby féminin l’année dernière, Caitlyn Halse a franchi un nouveau palier en 2024, inscrivant et marquant plusieurs essais, tout en faisant preuve d’une connaissance plus approfondie du jeu grâce à un jeu au pied puissant et précis.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Elle a impressionné au niveau du Super W et nous sommes tous impatients de la voir obtenir sa première cape », a confié l’entraîneure des Wallaroos, Jo Yapp, qui lui a offert cette opportunité et lui a donc permis de réaliser son rêve.

« C’est un sentiment extraordinaire. Jouer pour son pays est quelque chose d’énorme dans n’importe quel sport, mais c’était un grand rêve pour moi depuis que j’étais toute petite », confiait Caitlyn en conférence de presse dans la semaine.

« C’est un sentiment surréaliste que d’avoir la chance de jouer pour son pays, mais être l’une des plus jeunes à le faire, c’est juste formidable. »

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 3 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 12 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search