Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Ce qu'il faut savoir sur Samoa v Chili

(Photo by Marcelo Hernandez/Getty Images)

Huit jours après le début de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023, les Samoa disputeront leur premier match contre le Chili, nouveau chouchou du grand public, au Stade de Bordeaux.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les incroyables supporters du Chili ont fait monter la température lors du tout premier match de l’histoire des Sud-Américains dans la compétition à Toulouse, contre le Japon, la semaine dernière. Il risque d’en être de même à Bordeaux.

HISTORIQUE

Le Chili et les Samoa ne se sont jamais rencontrés au niveau international.

MATCH MARQUANT

On ne peut faire plus mémorable qu’un premier match. Le Chili est devenu la première équipe à faire ses débuts dans la compétition depuis 12 ans contre le Japon. Malgré la défaite, il est certain que les hommes de Pablo Lemoine se souviendront très longtemps de ce match.

En 1991, les Samoa, alors appelées Samoa occidentales, faisaient leurs débuts en Coupe du Monde de Rugby et impressionnaient la planète en battant le Pays de Galles (16-13) à Cardiff, se qualifiant au passage pour la phase à élimination directe.

POINT-CLÉ

Les joueurs qui n’ont plus joué au niveau international depuis 36 mois peuvent désormais jouer pour une nation avec laquelle ils ont un lien familial fort. C’est le cas des anciens All Blacks Lima Sopoaga, Steven Luatua et Charlie Faumuina ou de l’ex-Wallaby Christian Leali’ifano qui peuvent désormais représenter la terre de leurs ancêtres.

LE DUEL

Christian Leali’ifano contre Rodrigo Fernandez. Diego Escobar, héroïque à Toulouse, est sur le banc. Mais Fernandez, autre héros de la sélection et auteur du tout premier essai du Chili en Coupe du Monde de Rugby, est là. Il se frottera à l’expérimenté Christian Leali’ifano, qui a fait ses débuts pour les Samoa cette année contre le Japon et qui aura 36 ans le 22 septembre.

LA STAT INCROYABLE

Avant le forfait de Nicolas Garafulic sur blessure, le Chili comptait quatre groupes de frères dans son effectif de 33 joueurs.

L’ARBITRE

Paul Williams (Nouvelle-Zélande). À cause des restrictions liées à la pandémie de Covid-19 en vigueur à l’époque, Williams est devenu, en octobre 2020, le premier arbitre né en Nouvelle-Zélande à arbitrer un match de Bledisloe Cup en 40 ans.

LES ÉQUIPES

SAMOA : Duncan Paia’aua; Danny Toala, Ulupano Junior Seuteni, Tumua Manu, Nigel Ah-Wong; Christian Leali’ifano, Jonathan Taumateine; James Lay, Seilala Lam, Michael Alaalatoa (captain), Chris Vui, Theo McFarland, Taleni Junior Agaese Seu, Fritz Lee, Steven Luatua

Remplaçants : Sama Malolo, Jordan Lay, Paul Alo-Emile, Sam Slade, Sa Jordan Taufua, Ereatara Enari, Lima Sopoaga, Ed Fidow

CHILI : Inaki Ayarza; Santiago Videla, Domingo Saavedra, Matias Garafulic, José Ignacio Larenas; Rodrigo Fernandez, Marcelo Torrealba; Javier Carrasco, Tomas Dussaillant, Matias Dittus, Pablo Huete, Santiago Pedrero, Martín Sigren (captain), Clemente Saavedra, Raimundo Martínez

Remplaçants : Diego Escobar, Salvador Lues, Esteban Inostroza, Javier Eissmann, Alfonso Escobar, Ignacio Silva, Benjamin Videla, Pablo Casas

Related

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search