Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Felipe Contepomi, nouvel entraîneur de l’Argentine

Felipe Contepomi looks on as Los Pumas warm up. Photo by Gaspafotos/MB Media/Getty Images

L’ancien ouvreur de Toulon et du Stade Français succède à Michael Cheika à la tête de l’équipe nationale d’Argentine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Le numéro 585 des Pumas prendra en charge son ancienne équipe en 2024. L’Argentine a en effet dévoilé lundi 18 décembre le nom de Felipe Contepomi en tant que nouveau sélectionneur de l’équipe nationale.

L’annonce est quelque peu surprenante puisqu’il avait été annoncé que Michael Cheika, le prédécesseur de Contepomi, resterait probablement à son poste.

87 sélections avec los Pumas

L’ancien capitaine des Pumas avec qui il compte 87 sélections (1998-2013) a fait ses débuts d’entraîneur principal professionnel en 2015 avec le XV d’Argentine, avant d’occuper des postes d’assistant avec les Jaguares, le Leinster et, plus récemment, les Pumas.

En tant qu’assistant de Michael Cheika, Contepomi a contribué à mener l’Argentine à la quatrième place de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 en France et hérite d’une équipe composée de nombreux jeunes talents extrêmement prometteurs.

« J’ai eu l’honneur d’assister Michael Cheika dans la mise en œuvre d’un projet sportif qui nous a mis au défi et nous a enthousiasmés en tant que membre d’une grande équipe de rugby argentine », a déclaré Contepomi à propos de sa nomination.

« Pour cette raison, j’accepte l’opportunité qui m’est donnée par l’UAR (la fédération argentine de Rugby) pour continuer à travailler vers l’objectif désiré, la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2027 en Australie. »

Quid de Cheika ?

Le statut de Cheika reste un mystère à ce jour. Il y a quelques semaines, le président de la Fédération argentine de rugby, Gabriel Travaglini, avait révélé à Ole Rugby que les deux parties souhaitaient prolonger le contrat de l’Australien d’origine.

« Nous avons proposé à Cheika de rester jusqu’à la fin de la Coupe du monde et d’organiser le staff », avait-il déclaré.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Il s’est plié à cette exigence et a l’intention de rester ; nous sommes en train d’analyser la situation. Nous faisons tout notre possible pour avoir la meilleure structure possible pour la prochaine Coupe du monde. »

À ce moment-là, on considérait que ce n’était qu’une question de chiffres qui séparait Cheika de la signature d’un nouveau contrat.

Cheika, qui avait été nommé en mars 2022, a dirigé les Pumas sur 24 tests-matchs, enregistrant un bilan de 11 victoires et 13 défaites.

En guise de conclusion, Michael Cheika a déclaré : « Le fait d’avoir été l’entraîneur principal des Pumas me remplit de fierté et c’est l’une des expériences que j’ai le plus appréciées au cours de ma carrière d’entraîneur.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Bien que je sois né en Australie, une grande partie de moi restera toujours en Argentine.

« Je suis convaincu que Felipe et son staff vont diriger l’équipe de la meilleure façon. »

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 15 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search