France - Angleterre : un seul changement chez les Red Roses

Gatland is a highly accomplished coach, and I believe he knows what he is doing. IMV this is one of those darkest before the dawn moments, and I would give him another year to start showing results.

When he watched the Springbok game did he think England were the ones with green shirts?

Pretty much my interpretation.

I’d say France are going to be a real problem going forward. The rivalry between NZ and SA will always be there. But France worries me going forward.

So much red meat. So much alcohol.

Help.

Unless they’re needed to pack the bus? Sweep the sheds? Hold their colleagues hands in prayer at half time?

But anyway - Rassie would never underestimate in preparation for a match against any tier one.

But I can. The Welsh are going to get fcuked up today, six love.

Watch out for Cameron Hanekom. On at about the 60 minute mark.

A loose forward the size of Jasper Wiese, with the athleticism of Pieter Steph and the mongrel of Kwagga Smith.

Oh, and he’s a lineout option.

You can never be sure which team is pitching up until the whistle blows.

I think Contemponi is a fabulous coach.

He goes on to say that they just need to deal with the Bok scrums, lineouts and territorial game. Those are not one or two little things ...

Besides, I suspect Tony Brown would like to see his new attacking philosophy clicking against Wales. That involves a lot more than set pieces and kicking. And Gatland might want to be ready for it.

For me the big question is whether the Boks retain their shape and intensity, regardless of the scoreline. If they do that then it could be a cricket score.

But there have been times this year when we have seen them get into a kind of error strewn, shelter shelter, hot potato mode on attack. Hope we don't see that, because it is silly and ineffective. Also boring.

I would love to see the new Bok plan in full flight. But, sadly, my expectation is that we will be another England-like post-game interview, with Rassie "taking the win" but declaring that they did not play the way they intended to.

The list you provided has a few viable options. However they are not as good as Joe Schmidt is who can get the wallabies back into the top 4 or 5.

They should be groomed and developed, be part of this journey. If you read my post.

And if they aren’t, and if the future remains bleak, it will be because of Australian rugby run by Australians that make the decisions for Australian rugby to be blamed.

Not Joe Schmidt, or devious kiwis. Australians.