Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

France Rugby assume d'occuper les « territoires pauvres » en rugby féminin

Elisa Riffonneau (France) célèbre après le match entre la France et l'Irlande dans le Stade Marie-Marvingt, Le Mans, France samedi 23 mars 2024 (Photo by Dave Winter / Inpho).

En organisant un match du Six Nations féminin au Mans puis les finales des compétitions fédérales à Bourgoin-Jallieu, la fédé assume d’amener le rugby féminin là où il n’est pas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Et ça marche ! Pour le match d’ouverture des Bleues dans le Tournoi des Six Nations féminin 2024 contre l’Irlande, la Fédération Française de Rugby avait jeté son dévolu sur le stade Marie-Marvingt au Mans. Même les joueuses qui ne savaient pas où il se trouvait s’étaient amusées à le localiser sur une carte ou Google Maps.

Dans le Top 15 des meilleures affluences

Samedi 23 mars, c’était alors la première fois que la Sarthe accueillait un match de rugby d’une telle dimension. D’une capacité de 25 064 places, le stade Marie-Marvingt semblait le lieu idéal, même si plus souvent dédié au foot et aux concerts (avec une jauge de 40 000 spectateurs).

La meilleure affluence de l’histoire du stade est actuellement de 24 425 spectateurs (pour un match de coupe de la Ligue entre Le Mans FC et le Paris Saint-Germain en 2019), soit guère plus que l’affiche de Top 14 Stade français vs. SU Agen (24 085) en 2012.

Le 23 mars, 15 559 spectateurs avaient assisté à cette première d’un match de rugby féminin au Mans, ce qui le place dans le Top 15 des meilleures affluences dans cette enceinte sarthoise.

Des records en Elite 1

« Ce sont des territoires en développement de rugby féminin, mais pauvres », explique Brigitte Jugla, vice-présidente de la Fédération Française de Rugby en charge du rugby féminin, dans les colonnes du Dauphiné Libéré ce mercredi 10 avril.

« Du coup, quand l’équipe nationale ou les finales se font sur ces territoires-là, on voit de l’engouement, ça plaît au public. Et puis, ça aide les ligues, les départements, les clubs qui s’investissent sur le féminin. »

La même stratégie sera menée le 8 juin où toutes les finales des compétitions fédérales féminines seront organisées à Bourgoin-Jallieu (Isère) après Bordeaux en 2023 et Grenoble en 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

Deux des trois dernières rencontres du Tournoi des Six Nations féminin se dérouleront en France : France vs. Italie dimanche 14 avril à Jean-Bouin à Paris, puis le Crunch France vs. Angleterre le samedi 27 avril à Bordeaux.

Deux records pour des matchs de rugby féminin en Elite 1 ont été battus à quelques jours d’intervalle : 6 025 personnes au stade Michelin pour le match ASM Romagnat vs. Stade bordelais le 24 février dernier ; 6 397 spectateurs pour le match Stade toulousain vs. Blagnac à Ernest-Wallon le 3 mars.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 22 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search