Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

La France fait chuter la Nouvelle-Zélande pour la première fois en match de poule

PARIS, FRANCE - SEPTEMBER 08: Melvyn Jaminet of France makes the catch ahead of Richie Mo'unga of New Zealand to score his side's second try during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Pool A match between France and New Zealand at Stade de France on September 08, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Les Bleus ont joué en mode diesel pour le match d’ouverture de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby au Stade de France face à la Nouvelle-Zélande après deux mi-temps opposées ; une première laborieuse, une deuxième plus prometteuse.

ADVERTISEMENT

Après une première période assez pauvre avec des Bleus jouant en blanc peu créatifs, subissant les assauts des hommes en noir, les obligeant à jouer au pied pour tenter péniblement de se donner de l’air, la seconde période a remis le XV de France dans l’axe de la victoire.

Alors que la Nouvelle-Zélande n’avait jamais perdu un match de poule de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby, la France n’avait encore jamais mené à la mi-temps face aux All Blacks lors des confrontations en Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

Ce vendredi 8 septembre restera donc dans l’histoire alors que la France menait d’un point à la pause (9-8).

Rencontre
Coupe du Monde de Rugby
France
27 - 13
Temps complet
New Zealand
Toutes les stats et les données

Pendant cette première période, on aura tout vu : les All Blacks qui marquent dans la première minute de jeu (Mark Telea après une passe croisée de Beauden Barrett), trois pénalités de Thomas Ramos sur quatre, Julien Marchand obligé de sortir pour une gêne à la cuisse, la Nouvelle-Zélande malmenée en mêlée sous la pression des piliers rochelais, et des plaquages français manqués à la pelle (22 contre 3 seulement pour les Néo-Zélandais en première mi-temps).

L’avance 9-8 était généreuse après cette entame étouffante – au propre comme au figuré avec 33° C au coup d’envoi – où les deux équipes se rendaient coup pour coup.

Le break a visiblement porté ses fruits pour les tricolores qui semblaient déjà carbonisés après 40 minutes de jeu. Malgré un nouvel essai de l’ailier Telea dans le couloir de Penaud, les Français ont su remettre de l’énergie et de l’envie, commençant à trouver des failles dans la défense adverse, ne lésinant pas en conquête.

ADVERTISEMENT

Graphique d'évolution des points

France gagne +14
Temps passé en tête
47
Minutes passées en tête
33
59%
% du match passés en tête
41%
52%
Possession sur les 10 dernières minutes
48%
8
Points sur les 10 dernières minutes
0

Une première tentative de Penaud avortée à quelques centimètres de la ligne a semblé redonner du peps et la deuxième fut la bonne après une belle passe de Jalibert qui permit de fixer la défense adverse à cinq mètres de la ligne.

Ramos a retrouvé sa réussite aux perches (une transformation et deux pénalités), les Blacks ont aligné les pénalités (carton jaune sur Will Jordan), la sérénité est revenue dans le camp français.

Le jeu est resté brouillon dans l’ensemble, avec des relances au pied mal assurées. Mais la France est restée disciplinée (4 pénalités contre 12) et les Blacks ont été moins en réussite sur les plaquages (13 manqués contre 6 pour les Français en seconde période).

Le coup de grâce a été asséné à trois minutes de la fin suite à un turnover après une relance malheureuse de Beauden Barrett, Maxime Lucu dégageant avant que Melvyn Jaminet ne marque avant qu’il ne manque sa transformation.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search