Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Jelonch capitaine pour l’Uruguay

France's Anthony Jelonch (Getty Images)

Le sélectionneur de l’équipe de France, Fabien Galthié, a fait tourner son effectif – 12 changements – pour affronter l’Uruguay jeudi 14 septembre, après la victoire sur les All Blacks lors du premier tour de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

On s’attendait à des changements avec seulement six jours de repos après avoir affronté l’un des favoris du tournoi. L’Uruguay, 17e au classement mondial, est moins menaçant que la Nouvelle-Zélande, ce qui donne à Galthié l’occasion de reposer certains de ses joueurs. Seuls Cameron Woki, Gabin Villière et Yoram Moefana sont reconduits.

Le capitaine Antoine Dupont est le premier à quitter le groupe, le demi de mêlée étant remplacé par Maxime Lucu. Le numéro 8 Anthony Jelonch reprend le flambeau – il avait été capitaine lors de la tournée de 2021 en Australie – et fait sa première apparition depuis sa blessure au ligament croisé antérieur contractée lors du Tournoi des Six Nations.

1 Jean-Baptiste Gros

2 Pierre Bourgarit

3 Dorian Aldegheri

4 Cameron Woki

5 Romain Taofifenua

6 Paul Boudehent

7 Sekou Macalou

8 Anthony Jelonch (cap.)

9 Maxime Lucu

10 Antoine Hastoy

11 Gabin Villière

12 Yoram Moefana

13 Arthur Vincent

14 Louis Bielle-Biarrey

15 Melvyn Jaminet

Remplaçants :

16 Peato Mauvaka

17 Reda Wardi

18 Sipili Falatea

19 Bastien Chalureau

20 Thibaud Flament

21 François Cros

22 Baptiste Couilloud

23 Thomas Ramos

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search