Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Julien Marchand, indisponible jusqu'aux quarts ?

Julien Marchand of France is substituted during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Pool A match between France and New Zealand (Photo by David Ramos - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Le talonneur de l’équipe de France, Julien Marchand, s’est blessé aux ischio-jambiers contre les All Blacks vendredi 8 septembre et devrait manquer la fin des matchs de poule de la Coupe du monde.

ADVERTISEMENT

Le numéro 2 toulousain avait commencé le match avec un gros bandage à la cuisse gauche et n’a même pas pu attendre la mi-temps du match d’ouverture de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby au Stade de France avant de sortir pour ce qui a été confirmé par le sélectionneur Laurent Labit comme une blessure aux ischio-jambiers. Selon le Midi Olympique, le joueur de 28 ans risque d’être absent quatre à cinq semaines avant de passer des examens complémentaires la semaine prochaine, ce qui le priverait probablement des matchs contre l’Uruguay, la Namibie et l’Italie.

Maintenant que la France a franchi le plus gros obstacle de son groupe en battant les All Blacks 27-13, Labit a déclaré aujourd’hui que Marchand n’était même pas dans les plans du staff pour jouer contre l’Uruguay jeudi 14 septembre.

« Comme je l’ai dit, on ne va pas agir dans la précipitation. De toute manière, “Juju” (Marchand) n’était pas prévu pour le match face à l’Uruguay. Sa blessure ne change rien dans nos plans pour le moment », a déclaré Laurent Labit.

En attendant, « Sipili Falatea pourrait jouer talon, Baille aussi ».

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search