Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

La France à la 2e place du classement mondial

Baptiste Couilloud will battle it out with Lucu for the No 9 berth, with the former, a more dynamic, Dupont-type player (Photo by Lionel Hahn/Getty Images)

Le pays de Galles est la première équipe à réserver sa place pour les quarts de finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 après une victoire record 40-6 sur l’Australie à l’OL Stadium de Lyon.

ADVERTISEMENT

Le remplaçant de Dan Biggar, sorti sur blessure, le demi d’ouverture Gareth Anscombe, a marqué 23 points et a été nommé Joueur du Match Mastercard, tandis que le Pays de Galles a remporté la plus large victoire de son histoire face aux Wallabies.

La chute historique des Wallabies

Pour l’Australie, ce résultat signifie qu’elle pourrait ne pas se qualifier pour les quarts de finale pour la première fois dans l’histoire de la Coupe Monde de Rugby, tout en la faisant tomber à sa position la plus basse jamais atteinte, à savoir la 10e place dans le classement mondial World Rugby présenté par Capgemini.

L’Argentine a gagné 1,72 point pour sa victoire 19-10 sur les Samoa et l’Australie a perdu deux points et demi dans sa défaite. Les deux équipes ont donc échangé leur place, les Pumas remontant à la neuvième position et les Wallabies descendant à la dixième. L’Australie n’avait jamais été en deçà de la neuvième place.

En tête du classement, l’Irlande a gagné 3,20 points. La France est désormais son premier poursuivant, après sa victoire 13-8 sur l’Afrique du Sud lors du match d’anthologie de la poule B qui s’est déroulé au Stade de France.

Pourquoi la France est si haut

Bien que la France n’ait pas gagné de points pour sa victoire 96-0 sur la Namibie – la plus grande victoire de son histoire et son plus grand résultat jamais atteint en rugby international – en raison de la différence de 30,06 points entre les deux, elle a pris la deuxième place à l’Afrique du Sud, qui a été battue.

L’Afrique du Sud a perdu 1,97 point et sa nouvelle note de 89,70 points la place à 0,89 point des Bleus (90,59) et à 4,09 points de l’Irlande (93,79).

L’Italie a entamé le troisième tour des matchs mercredi 20 septembre en s’imposant 38-17 face à l’Uruguay. Ce résultat, combiné à la défaite des Samoa, a permis aux deux équipes d’échanger leurs places, les Azzurri étant désormais les mieux classées des deux nations, à la 11e place.

L’Ecosse et l’Angleterre inchangées

Il en va de même pour le Japon et la Géorgie : le match nul 18-18 des Lelos contre le Portugal leur a coûté suffisamment de points pour qu’ils cèdent la 13e place aux Brave Blossoms.

Une pénalité manquée dans les dernières secondes du match par Nuno Sousa Guedes a empêché le Portugal de remporter sa première victoire en Coupe du Monde de Rugby et d’atteindre un nouveau sommet dans le classement.

ADVERTISEMENT

L’Écosse et l’Angleterre conservent leurs places respectives de cinquième et sixième, après leurs victoires bonifiées contre les Tonga et le Chili.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search