Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

La Nouvelle-Zélande quitte le Top 2 mondial pour la première fois

CHRISTCHURCH, NOUVELLE-ZÉLANDE - 19 MAI : Les joueuses de Nouvelle-Zélande exécutent le Haka avant le match des Pacific Four Series 2024 entre les Black Ferns et le Canada à l'Apollo Projects Stadium le 19 mai 2024 à Christchurch, Nouvelle-Zélande. (Photo par Joe Allison - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Au terme d’un week-end historique, la Nouvelle-Zélande a quitté le Top 2 du classement mondial féminin World Rugby pour la première fois de son histoire.

ADVERTISEMENT

Au cours des huit années d’existence du classement féminin, les Blacks Ferns n’avaient jamais occupé une place autre que la première ou la deuxième, mais la première victoire du Canada sur les Blacks Ferns en 18 tentatives a changé la donne dimanche 19 mai.

Le Canada a décroché le titre des World Rugby Pacific Four Series 2024 grâce à une victoire sans précédent de 22 à 19 à Christchurch, qui a non seulement détrôné les championnes de l’année dernière, mais a également conduit les équipes à échanger leurs places au classement.

Alors que la Nouvelle-Zélande est tombée à son niveau le plus bas, à savoir la troisième place, le Canada se hisse à la deuxième position – égalant le classement le plus élevé de son histoire, qu’il avait occupé pour la dernière fois en novembre 2016.

L’avance de l’Angleterre en tête du classement a augmenté suite au revers de la Nouvelle-Zélande, passant de 6,34 points avant le match de dimanche à 7,77 points.

Dans le match de vendredi, les États-Unis, voisines du Canada, sont remontées au score pour battre l’Australie 32-25 dans le premier test féminin disputé à Melbourne.

Alors qu’elles étaient tombées à un niveau historiquement bas au 10e rang du classement, les Américaines sont remontée à la septième place après avoir signé leur première victoire dans les Pacific Four Series 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

Après avoir gagné deux points de classement, les Women’s Eagles sont passées devant trois équipes féminines du Six Nations, à savoir l’Irlande, l’Italie et le Pays de Galles.

La nouvelle position de l’Italie, la neuvième place, est la plus basse qu’elle ait atteint depuis mars 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search