La Rochelle : Bourgarit gravement touché au tibia et déjà opéré

Perhaps you're still the third best team in the world - on your best day. But it was good that you finally have to understand that without ref incompetence, youre not that good to begin with. I'm guessing your third world education won't let you though and you'll continue to spew utterly ignorant 💩

Rassie takes more risks but he has so much more credit in the bank e.g. Libbok cost them the game but they won't be piling on Rassie for it.

So he was the best available in an emergency if DMac went down and they hope that they can develop him into an All Black.

You raise a tricky dilemma. Any team is a sum of their parts. To make a point, lets say that South Africa aren't a team that has been able to take advantage, or use all if it's 'parts', to a maximum before, were as you could say that 2015 AB did use all of it's parts and become the 'most complete' team in history. Now a) that might not be exactly true of either team, and b) even if it was true one could argue that doesn't mean the result is going to go one way or the other. SA "limited" style could win out again ABs "complete" style etc.

I'm of the belief that attack trumps defence, that the ball will always beat the man.. that the AB's having been so good because they found upon the best style of rugby to play and ended up winning against all the odds. They have not had the best players, they make the best of their players. That's what I see clicking in this current side, theyre becoming 'complete' again. I don't know why they've not been able to do it all game. You can point to their discipline but it could easily be a drop in physical conditioning. They've all got bigger, it's been a big area of change in the NZ game. They've also lost cohesion with players being able to come in from Japan.

So yes and no. I think Sacha is someone to enable a complete game, but SA are going to also lose some key 'parts' to there game when the vets retire. Like how NZ still had some 'parts' post 2015, they had no one to link them, hence how I think this team now trumps those because they do look to have someone who can make them complete, despite the individual parts (read "players"). The parts will still matter though, England have some great props coming through, France look to have the best trajectory, will there be enough pieces for Sacha to put together? Your forwards will play a big factor, I really like the idea of BJD offload game adding to that completeness. That certainly doesn't take away from what theyve done, they might indeed have beat that opposite idea, or this new team. Certainly the chance is there to do it, and this current team hasn't been doing it. It will be hard to think of a 'great' team that is actually 'two' teams over a 4 year period!