Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

L'Anglaise Sarah Beckett suspendue trois semaines pour sa prise crocodile

L'Anglaise Sarah Beckett manquera les trois prochaines journées du Six-Nations féminin (Photo Morgan Harlow/The RFU Collection via Getty Images).

La troisième ligne centre de l’Angleterre Sarah Beckett manquera les trois prochains tours du Tournoi des Six Nations, à la suite de son expulsion pour son plaquage dangereux sur la centre italienne Michela Sillari, blessée sur l’action et contrainte de quitter le terrain.

ADVERTISEMENT

La N.8 anglaise a écopé dans un premier temps d’un carton jaune, 11 minutes après le début du match de dimanche dernier à Parme, mais sa faute a été transformée en carton rouge cinq minutes plus tard, à la suite d’un examen par le bunker.

Cela n’a pas empêché l’Angleterre de signer un premier succès dans ce Tournoi 2024, marquant la bagatelle de huit essais sans encaisser un seul point (48-0).

Synthèse du match

0
Coups de pied de pénalité
0
0
Essais
8
0
Transformations
4
0
Drops
0
104
Courses avec ballon
129
1
Franchissements
7
22
Turnovers perdus
21
6
Turnovers gagnés
6

Les Six-Nations ont publié un communiqué pour exprimer sa décision.

« Sarah Beckett, numéro 8 de l’équipe d’Angleterre, a comparu devant une commission disciplinaire indépendante par liaison vidéo après avoir reçu un carton rouge pour un acte de jeu déloyal contraire à la règle 9.20 (d) lors du match entre l’Italie et l’Angleterre le 24 mars.

« La commission disciplinaire indépendante était composée de Juan Pablo Spirandelli (président, Argentine), Jamie Corsi (pays de Galles) et Bogdan Zebega (Roumanie). La joueuse a reconnu qu’elle avait commis un acte de jeu déloyal mais a considéré que cela ne méritait pas un carton rouge.

« Toutefois, la Commission de discipline, après avoir examiné toutes les preuves disponibles et les observations de la joueuse et de ses représentants, a confirmé la décision d’infliger un carton rouge.

« En ce qui concerne la sanction, en appliquant les dispositions obligatoires de World Rugby en matière de sanctions, la commission disciplinaire a déterminé que l’incident justifiait un point d’entrée moyen de six semaines de suspension.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Des facteurs atténuants (remords de la joueuse, bonne moralité et comportement exemplaire lors de l’audience) ont été appliqués, réduisant le point d’entrée de six semaines de 50 %, soit trois semaines. »

Par conséquent, Sarah Beckett manquera les trois matchs suivants :

  • Angleterre – Pays de Galles (30 mars)
  • Écosse – Angleterre (13 avril)
  • Angleterre – Irlande (20 avril)

Womens Six Nations

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
England Women
1
1
0
0
5
2
France Women
1
1
0
0
5
3
Scotland Women
1
1
0
0
4
4
Wales Women
1
0
1
0
1
5
Ireland Women
1
0
1
0
0
6
Italy Women
1
0
1
0
0
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

r
reginaldgarcia 1 hour ago
Crusaders rookie earns 'other than Dupont' praise from All Blacks star

My father, a retired schoolteacher, has always been cautious with his money. He worked hard his entire life to build a modest retirement fund and trusted that it would support him in his golden years. So, when he told me about an “exclusive” investment opportunity in cryptocurrency that promised high returns, I was immediately suspicious. But he was convinced it was legitimate—after all, the website looked professional, and the salesperson had been so persuasive over the phone. Despite my warnings, he invested 15,000 USD of his savings. At first, everything seemed fine. He received regular updates and saw “profits” reflected in his online account. But when he tried to withdraw some money, the website suddenly went offline, and the phone number was disconnected. My father was devastated. He had been scammed, and his hard-earned savings were gone. I knew I had to act quickly. I reached out to TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY, a company I had read about online that specialized in tracing online fraud. I explained the situation, providing them with all the details: the fake website, the transaction records, and even the emails from the scammer. The team at TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY was incredibly understanding and assured me they would do everything possible to help. Using their expertise in digital forensics, they traced the scammer’s digital footprint and identified the offshore account where the money had been transferred. They worked tirelessly with international authorities to freeze the account and recover the funds. Within a few weeks, they successfully returned the 15,000 USD to my father. The relief on his face was indescribable. Not only had TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY restored his savings, but they had also given him peace of mind. They even took the time to educate him on how to spot investment scams in the future, empowering him to protect himself. This brought our family closer together. My father now understands the importance of skepticism and due diligence, and I’m grateful to TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY for their incredible work. They didn’t just recover money, they restored my father’s faith in justice and gave him a second chance to enjoy his retirement.EMAIL..Techcybersforcerecovery(@)cyberservices(.)comWHATSAPP... + 1.5.6.1.7.2.6.3.6.9.7

8 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Kyren Taumoefolau All Blacks stance splits opinions on eligibility

MP are a NZ side through and through, NZ is even having to pay for it.

Yes they caved to public demand, I bet it accomplished a lot of internal goals. They could have left it to the other groups, but I’m of the belief that they weren’t showing the capability to make it work as being a good reason for NZR to jump in and do it. I think it’s actually funded 50/50 between NZR and WR though.

(when nothing was stopping a pi player playing for any side in Super Rugby)

Neither is that fact true. Only 3 non NZ players are allowed in each squad.


I see you also need to learn what the term poach means - take or acquire in an unfair or clandestine way. - Moana have more slots for non eligible players (and you have seen many return to an NZ franchise) so players are largely making their own choice without any outside coercion ala Julian Savea.

Not one of these Kiwis and Aussies would go live in the Islands to satisfy any criteria, and I’d say most of them have hardly ever set foot in the islands, outside of a holiday.

Another inaccurate statement. Take Mo’unga’s nephew Armstrong-Ravula, if he is not eligible via ancestry in a couple of generations time, he will be eligible because he plays his rugby there (even if he’s only their for rugby and not living there), that is a recent change made by World Rugby to better reflect examples like Fabian Holland and Fakatava.

It’s becoming the jump-ship/zero loyalty joke that international League is.

Look I understand you’re reason to cry and make an example at any opportunity, but you don’t really need to anymore, other recent changes made by WR are basically going to stop the Ireland situation, and time (perhaps no more than a decade) will fix the rest.

26 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Owen Farrell's English understudy makes Top 14 team of the week Owen Farrell's English understudy makes Top 14 team of the week
Search