Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Le Canada déloge la France du Top 3 mondial

SYDNEY, AUSTRALIE - 11 MAI : Le Canada célèbre un essai de McKinley Hunt pendant le match des 2024 Pacific Four Series entre les Wallaroos australiennes et le Canada à l'Allianz Stadium le 11 mai 2024 à Sydney, en Australie. (Photo by Brett Hemmings - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

C’est un petit évènement auquel les Françaises ne peuvent malheureusement rien.

Le Canada vient de dépasser la France et s’est hissé à la troisième place du classement mondial féminin World Rugby pour la première fois depuis 17 mois.

ADVERTISEMENT

La France est donc bouté hors du Top 3 mondial pour la première fois depuis novembre 2022. Le XV de France féminin s’installe à la quatrième place, sa position la plus basse. Jamais encore la France n’a été en dehors du Top 4 mondial.

Si le Canada a réussi cet exploit, c’est suite à sa victoire 33-14 de samedi 11 mai sur l’Australie à Sydney qui leur a permis d’augmenter leur note de 1,25 point pour atteindre 87,52 points ; les Bleues étant juste derrière avec 87,27 points.

Cette victoire a également garanti aux filles de Kevin Rouet une place dans le Top 3 des World Rugby Pacific Four Series 2024 dont elles ont besoin pour se qualifier pour le WXV 1, qu’elles accueilleront en septembre et octobre.

La Nouvelle-Zélande a battu les États-Unis 57-5 lors de leur premier match de l’année, mais aucun point n’a été ajouté à leur classement en raison de l’écart de 17,99 points entre les deux équipes.

Les Black Ferns restent à la deuxième place avec 90,56 points – à 6,34 points de l’Angleterre – et les Etats-Unis restent à la 10e, la position la plus basse de leur histoire. Les Women’s Eagles ont un écart de 3,19 points avec le Japon.

L’Afrique du Sud s’est qualifiée pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby féminin 2025 ainsi que le WXV 2 plus tard cette année après avoir défendu avec succès la Rugby Africa Women’s Cup avec une victoire 46-17 sur le pays hôte, Madagascar.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cependant, le troisième titre régional des Springbok Women ne s’est pas accompagné d’une récompense au classement en raison de l’important écart de points entre elles et les Lady Makis.

Le résultat de l’autre match a cependant entraîné quelques changements : la défaite 38-17 du Cameroun face au Kenya a coûté deux places aux Nomades.

Les Nomades sont désormais classés 33e tandis que le Kenya conserve la 23e place, mais avec une meilleure note de 48,10 points.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 58 minutes ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Very poor understanding of what's going on and 0 ability to read. When I say playing behind the gain line you take this to mean all off-loads and site times we are playing in front of the gain line???


Every time we play a lot of rugby behind the gain line (for clarity, meaning trying to build an attack and use width without front foot ball 5m+ behind the most recent breakdown) we go backwards and turn the ball over in some way. Every time a player is tackled behind the most recent breakdown you need more and more people to clear out because your forwards have to go back around the corner, whereas opposition players can keep moving forward. Eventually you run out of either players to clear out or players to pass to and the result in a big net loss of territory and often a turnover. You may have witnessed that 20+ times in the game against England. This is a particularly dumb idea inside your own 40m which is where, for some reason, we are most likely to employ it.


The very best ABs teams never built an identity around attacking from poor positions. The DC era team was known for being the team that kicked the most. To engineer field position and apply pressure, and create broken play to counter attack. This current team is not differentiating between when a defence has lost it's structure and there are opportunities, and when they are completely set and there is nothing on. The reason they are going for 30 minute + periods in every game without scoring a single point, even against Japan and a poor Australian team, is because they are playing most of their rugby on the back foot in the wrong half.

43 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

43 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The joy, spirit and obstacles of the rugby pilgrim The joy, spirit and obstacles of the rugby pilgrim
Search