Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Le Chili ou l’Uruguay sur la route du XV de France

Augusto Bohme (Chili) célèbre après avoir marqué un essai, qui est plus tard refusé à la suite d'une vérification TMO, lors du match de la Coupe Monde du Rugby France 2023 entre l'Argentine et le Chili au Stade de la Beaujoire, le 30 septembre 2023 à Nantes, en France. (Photo par David Ramos - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

La France pourrait affronter le Chili ou l’Uruguay dans le cadre de la tournée des Bleus en Argentine en juillet, et une annonce devrait être intervenir très prochainement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Selon Rugbyrama et L’Equipe, cette perspective s’inscrit dans le dialogue en cours entre la Ligue nationale de rugby (LNR) et la Fédération française de rugby (FFR) quant à la mise à disposition des internationaux français.

Related

Il était déjà annoncé que la France affrontera les Pumas en Argentine les samedi 6 et 13 juillet. Mais un troisième match contre une équipe internationale encore inconnue devrait être annoncé prochainement.

« En plus des deux rencontres face à l’Argentine, un match de France Développement sera organisé en milieu de semaine, face au Chili ou à l’Uruguay », croit savoir L’Equipe.

Une aubaine pour les nations émergentes

La perspective de voir les Français affronter le Chili ou l’Uruguay dans un match international serait un grand pas dans la bonne direction pour les équipes émergentes du rugby en mal de rencontres de très haut niveau.

Le Chili et l’Uruguay sont devenus les coqueluches des supporters lors de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 en France. Leurs performances ont attiré l’attention des supporters lorsqu’ils ont bousculé les équipes établies dans les poules.

Si le Chili n’est pas parvenu à remporter un seul match de la poule D, il s’est admirablement comporté face au Japon (42-12), aux Samoa (43-10), à l’Angleterre (71-0) et à l’Argentine (59-5).

Los Teros ont quant à eux remporté une victoire 36-26 contre la Namibie, tandis que leurs autres matchs ont été perdus 27-12 contre la France, 38-17 contre l’Italie et 73-0 contre la Nouvelle-Zélande.

De plus en plus de rencontres contre « les gros »

Selon Americas Rugby News, des pourparlers avancés sont en cours pour que l’Uruguay affronte l’Argentine en 2024 et tous les ans par la suite.

ADVERTISEMENT

Depuis la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023, l’espoir est que des nations comme l’Uruguay et le Chili, ainsi que des équipes comme le Portugal, soient en mesure d’affronter régulièrement les équipes les mieux classées au monde.

Related

L’annonce selon laquelle les Springboks, champions du monde, rencontreront le Portugal pour la première fois le samedi 20 juillet dans un lieu à désigner a fait parler.

Le Portugal aussi a contribué à des matchs mémorables lors de la Coupe du monde, avec un match nul palpitant contre la Géorgie et une victoire 24-23 sur les Fidji lors de leur dernier match de poule, ce qui constitue un énorme accomplissement.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 50 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search