Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Le pied de Farrell envoie les Anglais en demi-finale

Fiji's inside centre Josua Tuisova reacts during the France 2023 Rugby World Cup quarter-final match between England and Fiji at the Velodrome stadium in Marseille, south-eastern France, on October 15, 2023. (Photo by NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP) (Photo by NICOLAS TUCAT/AFP via Getty Images)

Cette fois encore, les statistiques n’ont pas menti. Favorite de ce troisième quart de finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023, l’Angleterre (6e au classement mondial) a largement dominé les Fidji (10e) pour l’emporter 30-24 au Stade de Marseille dimanche 15 octobre.

ADVERTISEMENT
Rencontre
Coupe du Monde de Rugby
England
30 - 24
Temps complet
Fiji
Toutes les stats et les données

Vainqueurs surprises lors de leur précédente rencontre l’été dernier à Twickenham (30-22), les Fidji n’ont pu rééditer l’exploit, s’inclinant pour la huitième fois en neuf tests – et pour la troisième fois en autant de rencontres en Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

Pour la sixième fois de son histoire, l’Angleterre file en demi-finale au terme d’un quart de finale électrique où une forte tension a souvent opposé les joueurs.

Cinq pénalités

Malgré une entame à la fois physique et prometteuse, les Fidji ont vite pris la mauvaise habitude d’être pénalisés à portée de pied d’Owen Farrell qui ne s’est pas privé de les punir lourdement par cinq pénalités (une manquée), contre une seule côté Fidjien (trois manquées par Lomani).

Les deux seuls essais anglais ont été inscrit par la paire de centres qui a exploité deux belles brèches en première période avec Manu Tuilagi roulant sur lui-même (14e) et Joe Marchant plongeant dans l’en-but (23e).

Momentum

0'
HT
FT
England
Fiji

Malgré un carton jaune donné à l’ailier Vinaya Habosi après un contact tête contre tête avec Marcus Smith, les Flying Fijians ont été fidèles à leur réputation en sauvant une action bien mal engagée en la couronnant de succès grâce à une passe audacieuse entre les jambes de Vilimoni Botitu conduisant à l’essai du numéro 8 Viliame mata (28e).

Menés 21-10 à la pause, les hommes de Simon Raiwalui ont construit patiemment pour tenter de renverser la tendance de leur premier quart de finale depuis 2007.

En face, les Anglais ont tenté en vain de percer les lignes fidjiennes à force de coups de pied pour gagner du terrain et tenter de contourner une défense très agressive, mais ce sont les Fidjiens et leur jeu à la main qui ont ravi les plus de 65 000 spectateurs de Marseille.

La remontée des Fidjiens

Menés de 14 points, ils ont réussi à créer le chaos dans la défense anglaise emmenés par un franchissement ou une passe après contact d’un Semi Radradra en forme afin de marquer coup sur coup par Peni Ravai (63e) et Botitu (67e). Avec leur nouveau botteur, Kuruvoli parvenait à recoller au score à dix minutes de la fin (24-24).

ADVERTISEMENT

Mais les Anglais n’ont dû leur salut que grâce à un drop (71e) et d’une ultime pénalité (77e) de de Owen Farrell pour remporter une victoire âprement disputée jusqu’à la dernière seconde où tout pouvait encore basculer après 15 temps de jeu de la part des Fidjiens (30-24).

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search