Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

L'équipe de Roumanie chassée de son stade par le FC Barcelone

Vue générale du stade Arcul de Triumf avant le match du Championnat d'Europe de rugby 2022 entre la Roumanie et la Géorgie, le 12 mars 2022 à Bucarest, Roumanie. (Photo Vasile Mihai-Antonio - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Siège de la sélection roumaine, le stade Arcul de Triumf est actuellement au cœur d’un bras de fer entre la fédération roumaine de rugby (Federa?ia Român? de Rugby, FRR) et le gouvernement local, rendant incertain le futur des Stejarii.

Le stade actuel a remplacé le Stadionul Arcul de Triumf, démoli en 2018, après 114 ans de bons et loyaux services. Pendant de longues années, il fut le berceau du rugby roumain et a abrité certains des matchs les plus marquants de l’histoire des Stejarii.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jusqu’à la fin des années 1990, la France se rendait en Roumanie tous les deux ans, et c’est dans ce stade que les Bleus ont concédé quelques défaites marquantes, notamment quatre entre 1974 et 1982.

Toutefois, depuis 2022, l’enceinte n’est plus réservée exclusivement au rugby. Elle peut accueillir d’autres disciplines, ce qui a engendré des débats houleux entre les différents utilisateurs.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Octavian Morariu, président de Rugby Europe et ancien président de la FRR, a fait part de ses inquiétudes à ce sujet dans une interview accordée au média sportif Prosports en 2022.

« Je suis légitime pour de cette situation sous trois angles : en tant qu’ancien jouer, président, et dirigeant de Rugby Europe. Comme beaucoup de mes anciens coéquipiers, je suis indigné et choqué par cette décision.

« En tant qu’ancien président, je trouve également choquant que le rugby se retrouve ainsi chassé de son patrimoine, car le site où se situe le nouvel Arcul de Triumf a toujours été, depuis plus de 100 ans, un site dédié au rugby. Si je prends le point de vue de Rugby Europe, cela sera difficile de programmer des matchs internationaux de rugby si la fédération roumaine perd le contrôle du stade. »

Le ministre des sports « ne comprend pas nos préoccupations »

À l’époque de l’interview, Octavian Morariu, qui a notamment évolué à l’ASPTT Paris dans les années 1980, a également mis en cause Carol-Eduard Novak, alors ministre de la Jeunesse et des sports.

« Il ne comprend pas nos préoccupations, même quand on lui explique la situation. Au moins, l’ancien ministre Ionu Stroe avait compris notre point de vue, et l’importance de ces installations pour le rugby en Roumanie. »

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Depuis quelques mois, la fédération roumaine de football a conclu un accord avec le FC Barcelone afin d’ouvrir une académie de jeunes joueurs, qui se tiendrait à l’Arcul de Triumf.

Si ce projet voit le jour, cela pourrait même limiter encore davantage l’accès du rugby roumain aux équipements, ce qui constituerait un coup dur.

La FRR revendique 10 000 joueurs licenciés, et a mis en place un championnat semi-professionnel, et mise beaucoup sur une restructuration totale de la discipline.

Avec la Coupe du Monde 2027 en ligne de mire, les prochaines années joueront un rôle crucial dans l’avenir du rugby roumain. Si elle devait perdre son principal outil de travail, la FRR connaitrait à coup sûr des problèmes financiers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cet article a été initialement publié en anglais sur RugbyPass.com et adapté en français par Jérémy Fahner.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: Retallick scores, Perenara makes Black Rams debut -Japan Rugby League One Retallick scores; Perenara makes debut -Japan Rugby League
Search