Édition du Nord
Select Edition
Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

L'Ouganda prend sa revanche sur la Belgique en quart du Sevens Challenger

Yvonne Najjuma et Mary Ayot (Ouganda) célèbrent la victoire contre la Belgique lors de la deuxième journée du World Rugby HSBC Sevens Challenger 2024 au Sevens Stadium, le 13 janvier 2024 à Dubaï, aux Émirats arabes unis. Crédit photo : Mike Lee - KLC fotos pour World Rugby

Cruelle déception pour l’équipe féminine de rugby à sept de Belgique. Après un parcours sans faute en phase de poule, elles ont chuté face à l’Ouganda en quart de finale du World Rugby HSBC Sevens Challenger à Dubaï.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ironie puisque les filles de Emiel Vermote avaient déjà battu l’Ouganda 14-5 (essais de Cécile Blondiau et de Noémie Van de Poele) la veille en phase de poule.

Related

La journée avant pourtant bien commencé avec la victoire 17-7 sur la Thaïlande, clôturant une phase de poule impeccable après une autre autre victoire la veille sur la Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée (31-10).

Malgré un bon début de la Belgique avec Noémie Van de Poele qui marque dès la troisième minute en quart de finale, l’Ouganda revient au score une minute plus tard avec Grace Nabaggala qui en marque un deuxième à la 12e.

Les Belges avaient de quoi tenir, mais leur indiscipline leur a coûté extrêmement cher. Pas moins de quatre cartons leur ont été attribués : trois jaunes et un rouge.

La Belgique s’est retrouvée à cinq joueuses pour finir la première période avec deux cartons sur Margaux Stevins et Femke Soens.

Le retour des vestiaires n’a pas été plus calme sur le plan de la discipline puisque Femke Soens a écopé de son deuxième jaune, menant au rouge, condamnant les Belges à joué à six pendant les cinq longues dernières minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Elles ont néanmoins montré qu’elles ne baissaient pas les bras pour autant, déjà en ne prenant pas la marée face à l’Ouganda, mais aussi par Cécile Blondiau qui a marqué le dernier essai de la rencontre à la 14e pour revenir à cinq points des Ougandaises (12-17).

Les Belges disputeront un match de classement dimanche 14 janvier.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video

South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Lions Share | Episode 5

Play Video

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

Play Video

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

Play Video

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

Play Video

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 26 minutes ago
New Zealanders may not understand, but in France Test rugby is the 'B movie'

But he was wrong, he had to take back what he said. But maybe this only happened because he came out and was honest with his initial plans?


He’s simply in a position where he should be far more professional.


I don’t really follow much media, especially SM, but again, I’ve not seen anyone complaining. Plenty of ridicule and pointing out things like it being disrespectful to the game, but as far as the English language goes, that’s not complaining. Nick Bishop for instance hasn’t been complaining, he’s simply saying Galthie made a bad decision for France’s prospects (which when the common reply is ‘thats how it is’).


Complaining would be views expressing that the FFR should have put the tour back a week so that all T14 finalists could attend. Complaining would be saying they’ve been robbed of seeing the worlds best stars. Complaining would be saying players can simply take extra weeks off from T14. I’ve only seen advice and suggestions that these are things France need to look-at-for-the-future.


Basically I tried to communicate with French fans because they don’t understand what’s being communicated. ALL reactions I have seen shared here by French supports have all seemed way over the top compared what I’ve seen expressed about this tour.

the players are expected to play in too many matches, for too many minutes, and need more rest and recovery time.

This is the message I have been sharing. So something needs to happen, whether thats France pull out of more Internationals or rest players from more domestic games, who knows, but I also don’t think what they have now is working. It’s obviously much better than 3-4 years ago, but they appear to want to work even harder at it like you say. Personally I’ve only seen LNR be reasonable, I hear much less of their other internationals being denied/influenced not to play, so I imagine that they will give even further (as I can’t really see France pulling out the other international windows as well).

147 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

Cameron Woki picked at the base of a ruck and jumped/dived over. That would clearly now be penalised.

But the Sheehan try is different to my eye. It starts from a tap penalty, he drives forward, the two WB defenders go low for a tackle in the assumption Sheehan will go to ground. He does not, but seeing the hole now left dives through it. In this case surely there is zero danger there.

World Rugby’s terminology/interpretation recently (shared again after this) is that it’s ok to hurdle/dive (that includes over, say a ruck, which we have seen this many times even in this years SR) to score a try, but it’s not (OK) to avoid a tackle. I can’t remember the one you describe (which may have been where their clarification came from) but that would sound OK. Sheehan definitely was playing the rope-a-dope and dived to avoid being tackled (can’t call it tackled really, just blocked/stopped lol), so shouldn’t have been awarded (I wasn’t aware of this last definition so just thought it was a very smart move). Was it premeditated? I’m not sure, but he could definitely have collected someones head if that was the case. And I guess even if he saw the space, I guess it’s not something they can allow as others might try it and get it terribly wrong?


Well summed up Miz. I have been thinking the whole situation of events that lead to this type of sneaky move is the problem, particularly as it relates to the difficulty and effort defenders now go to stop such situations (like say Slippers try), where players go extremely low to drive from meters out (and in most cases plays just trying to dive under). It’s also ugly business seeing attempt after attempt to go in under the tacklers, especially with them not really being able to perform a ‘tackle’ at all. I would simply give the defenders their goal line. All they need is some part of the body on or behind, and this will stop the play (being the fuel to this fire) from being attempted I reckon.

39 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Wallabies duo rally around underfire Carlo Tizzano Wallabies duo rally around underfire Carlo Tizzano