Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Menacé de mort, l'arbitre Tom Foley arrête sa carrière internationale

Referee, Tom Foley checks a video replay during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Gloucester and Newcastle Falcons at Kingsholm Stadium on April 24, 2021 in Gloucester, England. Sporting stadiums around the UK remain under strict restrictions due to the Coronavirus Pandemic as Government social distancing laws prohibit fans inside venues resulting in games being played behind closed doors. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

L’arbitre Tom Foley a annoncé qu’il abandonnait son rôle d’arbitre de rugby international suite aux agressions en ligne qu’il a subies après la finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

L’Anglais était l’arbitre vidéo (TMO) lors de la victoire 12-11 de l’Afrique du Sud sur les All Blacks à Paris à la fin du mois d’octobre et s’est depuis exprimé sur les menaces de mort qu’il a reçues à la suite de la finale. Ces menaces ont été proférées à l’issue d’un match qui s’est soldé par trois cartons jaunes et le premier carton rouge de l’histoire de la finale de la RWC infligé au capitaine des All Blacks, Sam Cane.

Related

Foley prend sa retraite dans la foulée de l’arbitre de la finale, Wayne Barnes, bien que ce dernier ait mis un terme total à sa carrière. Tom Foley n’officiera plus que dans le Gallagher Premiership.

13 années d’arbitrage et un flot d’insultes

« Après avoir atteint le sommet de l’arbitrage lors de la finale de la Coupe du Monde de rugby, le moment est venu de faire une pause dans le jeu international », a-t-il déclaré.

« Au cours des treize dernières années, j’ai eu la chance d’arbitrer aux côtés de nombreux professionnels dévoués et d’être impliqué dans certains des plus grands matchs du rugby international. Cependant, la pression et l’examen minutieux que j’ai subis après la finale, ainsi qu’un torrent de critiques et d’insultes en ligne, ont contribué à réaffirmer que c’est la bonne décision pour moi à ce stade de ma vie.

« Alors que c’est un privilège de se trouver au cœur de certains des moments les plus emblématiques de ce sport, les niveaux croissants de vitriol, au moment où les exigences et les attentes sont si élevées, m’ont conduit à cette situation.

« Travailler en tant qu’officiel de match international vous éloigne de chez vous pendant de longues périodes, et j’ai hâte de passer plus de temps à la maison avec mes jeunes enfants. Je suis très reconnaissant à ma famille pour le soutien qu’elle m’a apporté tout au long de ma carrière ; sans elle, rien de tout cela n’aurait été possible. »

Bill Sweeney, PDG de la RFU, a commenté : « Je voudrais remercier Tom pour sa contribution exceptionnelle à l’arbitrage international. Tom a arbitré 48 matchs au niveau international et est considéré comme l’un des meilleurs officiels de match vidéo au niveau mondial.

Tom Foley continuera d’arbitrer au niveau national

« Les agressions qu’il a subies depuis la finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby, ainsi que d’autres officiels impliqués dans ce jeu, sont totalement inacceptables et personne ne devrait être traité de la sorte, alors qu’il fait son travail pour le sport pour lequel il est si engagé et si passionné.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Nous ferons tout ce qui est en notre pouvoir pour aider à lutter contre les abus visant les officiels de match et les joueurs, et nous invitons tous les acteurs de notre rugby à réfléchir au rôle qu’ils peuvent jouer dans la défense des valeurs du rugby.

« Bien que Tom prenne du recul par rapport à l’arbitrage international, nous sommes heureux qu’il continue à faire partie du groupe des officiels de match du jeu professionnel de la RFU et que le sport continue à bénéficier de sa grande expérience au niveau national. »

Tout ça pour un en-avant

Un article paru fin novembre sur stuff.co.nz revenait sur un fait d’arbitrage jugé peu clair lors de la finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 le 28 octobre entre l’Afrique du Sud et la Nouvelle-Zélande ;

Stuff écrivait ainsi : « Les All Blacks ont un autre incident à ajouter à leur dossier de “et si” après leur défaite 12-11 contre l’Afrique du Sud en finale de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

« Stuff a appris que World Rugby avait reconnu en privé aux All Blacks que le refus de l’essai d’Aaron Smith en finale était en fait contraire aux règles, mais qu’il refusait de l’admettre publiquement (rumeur que World Rugby a publiquement et fermement démenti dans la foulée, ndlr).

ADVERTISEMENT

« L’essai a été annulé lorsque le TMO Tom Foley a repéré un en-avant lors d’une touche, et l’arbitre Wayne Barnes a alors refusé l’essai. Cependant, l’en-avant s’est produit quatre phases de jeu avant l’essai de Smith, alors que le TMO n’a le pouvoir de regarder que deux phases en arrière pour tout en-avant précédant un essai. »

Confession en podcast

Tom Foley s’était ouvert de cette situation alarmante dans le podcast de sa consœur arbitre Sara Cox, Two Locks and a Cox la semaine dernière.

« Il s’agissait de menaces directes », racontait-il. « Contre vous, votre famille et vos enfants. Des choses comme : ‘J’espère que ta famille va mourir dans un épouvantable accident de voiture. Je vais te traquer et te trancher la gorge’.

« La plupart d’entre elles sont acceptables. Une grande partie provient de combattants du clavier. Mais lorsqu’ils disposent de suffisamment d’informations pour que ça pose un problème, c’est là que ça devient inquiétant. »

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 4 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

3 Go to comments
J
JW 8 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 13 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: Ex-NRL cult hero scores a try on Japan Rugby League One debut Valynce Te Whare scores a try on Japan League One debut
Search