Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Montpellier : Haouas, adoubé par Altrad et Laporte, réintégré

Mohed Altrad (à gauche) a décidé de réintégrer Mohamed Haouas malgré ses dernières frasques, une décision saluée par son directeur sportif Bernard Laporte. (Photo by Pascal GUYOT / AFP) (Photo by PASCAL GUYOT/AFP via Getty Images)

Le président de Montpellier Mohed Altrad a décidé de réintégrer le pilier Mohamed Haouas en dépit de ses derniers ennuis judiciaires, début décembre.

ADVERTISEMENT

C’est un revirement qu’on a senti venir, au gré des déclarations, ou plutôt de l’absence de déclarations des dirigeants du MHR à la suite des dernières frasques de Mohamed Haouas.

Retrouvé endormi et en état d’ivresse dans sa voiture, début décembre, le pilier international (16 sélections) a été réintégré à l’effectif montpelliérain, trois semaines après sa mise à pied. Le directeur du sportif du MHR, Bernard Laporte, l’a confirmé dans les colonnes de Midi Libre.

Related

Une décision à contre-courant de ce qu’avait déclaré le propriétaire du club Mohed Altrad, lors du retour d’Haouas dans l’Hérault, l’été dernier. « Au premier écart, il repart. J’espère qu’il a compris avec tout ce qui lui est arrivé », avait-il alors assuré.

Le MHR ne dispose que de deux piliers droits en plus d’Haouas

Cette volte-face peut se comprendre d’un point de vue sportif : avec seulement deux piliers droits de métier en plus d’Haouas (Wilfried Hounkpatin et Luka Japaridze), le MHR a besoin d’un troisième N.3 de haut niveau pour jouer à la fois le Top 14 et la Challenge Cup.

Mais on peut aussi y voir la décision d’Altrad, qui avait également répété qu’il ne laisserait « pas tomber » le joueur, qu’il épaule depuis 15 ans maintenant, et dont la relation dépasse celle d’employeur-employé.

Ce que confirme Laporte dans le quotidien régional : « Tout le monde pense que c’est un tocard, mais ce n’est pas vrai. Je suis ravi que le président ait pris la décision de le réintégrer, parce qu’il le mérite ».

L’ancien sélectionneur de l’équipe de France assure que les derniers événements malheureux liés à Haouas n’avaient « pas eu d’impact » sur le groupe. « Quand tu connais l’histoire… Mais comme on a dit à Momo : ‘Toi, t’as le droit à rien. Tu ne peux rien faire. C’est comme ça. Il faut que tu l’assimiles dans ta vie’ ».

ADVERTISEMENT

Le MHR a donc décidé d’offrir une nouvelle chance au joueur, au passé judiciaire chargé entre violences conjugales, cambriolage et bagarre. Si Joan Caudullo avait démenti l’information de la prolongation de contrat signée par Mohamed Haouas depuis sa dernière garde à vue, Bernard Laporte ne s’est pas exprimé sur le sujet auprès de nos confrères de Midi Libre.

Related


Vous souhaitez être parmi les premiers à vous procurer des billets pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2027 en Australie ? Inscrivez-vous ici.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

Of course not, but were not going to base our reasoning on what is said in one comment in a particular scenario and time, are we?


Actually, you are? Seriously?

Although Burke readily admits “I am driven by international rugby”, his final destination is still unknown. He could be one day replacing Finn Russell in the navy blue of Scotland, or challenging Marcus Smith for the right to wear a red rose on his chest, or cycling all the way home to the silver fern. It is all ‘Professor Plum in the billiards room with the lead pipe’ type guesswork, as things stand.

You yourself suggested it? Just theoretically? Look I hope Burke does well, but he's not really a player that has got a lot of attention, you've probably read/heard more him in this last few months than we have in his 4 years. Your own comments also suggest going overseas is a good idea to push ones case for national selection, especially for a team like NZ being so isolated. So i'll ask again, as no of your quotes obviously say one thing or the other, why don't you think he might be trying to advance his case like Leicester did?


Also, you can look at Leicesters statements in a similar fashion, where no doubt you are referring to his comments made while in NZ (still playing a big part of the WC campaign in his case). You should be no means have taken them for granted, and I'd suggest any other coach or management and he might not have returned (been wanted back).

126 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

As Razor should be, he is the All Black coach after all. Borthwick or Schmidt, not so much. The point I was trying to make is that people are comparing Razors first year (14 games) versus Fosters first 14 games, which were over two years and happened to conclude just before he lost all of his EOYT games (Ireland, France, England etc). Not to mention them being COVID level opponents.


So who were these 6 teams and circumstances of Marcus's loses? I had just written that sentence as a draft and it was still there after adding the prior sentence, so just left it there lol. So not bullying no, but left essentially to say 'i'm not going to find out of myself', yes. I thought I had already proved the need for that sort of requirement with the Razor reference. So as per above, there would be a lot of context to take out of those 14 games (those shared between Farrell Ford and Smith) against higher opponents. It's a good stat/way to highlight the your point, but all a stat like that really does is show you theres something to investigate. Had you done this investigation prior to coming to your realisation, or after?


Yes, my view is that England did very well to push New Zealand on multiple occasions, and Marcus specifically in keeping England in the game against Australia. Personally I think Englands results are more down to luck however. And as I said, I'm here to be swayed, not defend Marcus as the #1. I think I understand were you're coming from, and you make a good observation that the 10 has a fair bit to do with how fast a side can play (though what you said was a 'Marcus neutral' statement) and the same argument has been made with the All Blacks fascination with playing players like Beauden Barrett at 10 who can't orchestrate an attack like that in order to compound LQB into points. Even a 10 like Dmac is more a self creator than one that is a cog in a wider plan.


But I still don't think you'd be right if you've put down the sides lack of LQB (pretty sure I remember checking that stat) compared to the 6N as being something to do with a Marcus Smith side. We've seen other similar teams who rely on it being found out recently as well, I just think it's harder to get that flow on (lets not making it a debate about the relative strength of the hemispheres) now (hence said investigation into those games and contexts are required).


25 is also young, he is the best fit to take the side to a RWC. Ford or Farrell are not. Fin could be, but as you've said with Marcus, that would require a lot of change elsewhere in the team 2 years out of a WC. Marcus will get a 6N to prove himself so to speak, unless Fin gets in quick, I don't think you should want a change if you get a couple of reasonable results. But then you expect England to be in the top 3 of the world, let alone the 6N...

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 2024 was an annus horribilis for Wales, so can 2025 provide an upturn? 2024 was an annus horribilis for Wales, so can 2025 provide an upturn?
Search