Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Laura Di Muzio : la tendance préoccupante du XV de France féminin

VANCOUVER, COLOMBIE-BRITANNIQUE - 12 OCTOBRE : Les joueuses de l'équipe de France arrivent avant le match de poule WXV1 opposant la Nouvelle-Zélande à la France, au BC Place, le 12 octobre 2024, à Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique. (Photo par Rich Lam - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Après leur défaite face au Canada et leur victoire poussive face aux Etats-Unis, les joueuses de Gaëlle Mignot et David Ortiz affrontaient les Néo-Zélandaises, championnes du monde en titre, auteures, elles aussi, d’une compétition décevante : deux défaites face à l’Irlande et l’Angleterre.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ce match était donc la dernière occasion pour ces deux nations de montrer leur valeur sur la scène internationale et de se rassurer à quelques mois de la future coupe du monde.

Si le match a tenu toutes ses promesses en termes d’intensité, il a petit à petit basculé en faveur des Black Ferns qui n’ont cessé de produire du jeu tout au long de la partie, pour finalement s’imposer 39-14.

Décalage en termes de proposition offensive

La première mi-temps aurait pu être différente si les Bleues n’avaient pas encaissé deux essais en moins d’un quart d’heure. Vaillantes au combat, les coéquipières de Manaé Feleu s’appuient sur leur défense collective pour repousser les assauts adverses, mais ont dès le début, couru après le score.

Les Françaises s’accrochent et parviennent à revenir à hauteur des championnes du monde grâce à deux essais plein de réalisme de Gros et Feleu. A la mi-temps, l’écart de 6 points (20-14) ne reflète néanmoins pas l’aisance affichée des Néo-Zélandaises, qui semblent maitriser leur rugby de bout en bout.

Le retour des vestiaires sera terrible pour les Bleus qui vont encaisser trois essais avant l’heure de jeu (39-14). Le score en restera là, mais la deuxième mi-temps illustre le décalage en termes de proposition offensive de ces deux nations.

Les Françaises sans solution

Les Françaises balbutient leurs attaques et perdent à nouveau des ballons clés proches de la zone de marque tandis que les Blacks Ferns déroulent et impressionnent par leur alternance.

Capables de casser la ligne française sur de gros duels offensifs, elles peuvent ensuite exploiter les espaces sur l’ensemble du terrain avec une gestuelle quasi parfaite. Les plaquages des habituelles Sochat, Fall et Vernier ne peuvent contenir un collectif si bien rôdé.

Les Françaises terminent avant dernières de ce WXV, sans avoir su trouver les solutions au fur et à mesure de la compétition.

ADVERTISEMENT

WXV 1

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
England Womens
3
3
0
0
14
2
Ireland Womens
3
2
1
0
10
3
Canada Womens
3
2
1
0
9
4
New Zealand Womens
3
1
2
0
7
5
France Womens
3
1
2
0
5
6
USA Womens
3
0
3
0
0

Plus d’inquiétudes que de certitudes

Ces confrontations auront permis de faire un véritable bilan à un an de la coupe du monde : les Anglaises paraissent intouchables et déjà prêtes pour « leur » mondial à domicile, tandis que le Canada et l’Irlande ont marqué d’indéniables progrès pour s’inviter durablement à la table des grandes nations.

La Nouvelle-Zélande n’est pas à la place où on l’attendait mais a su rassurer dans son contenu. Les Françaises font clairement la mauvaise opération du WXV, repartant du Canada avec plus d’inquiétudes que de certitudes.

Les prochains moins de travail seront décisifs pour renverser cette tendance préoccupante. Plus que jamais, les Bleues vont devoir se resserrer et faire preuve d’une abnégation sans faille pour montrer un visage nouveau lors du prochain Tournoi.

La demande de billets pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby Féminin 2025 en Angleterre sera ouverte à partir du 5 novembre (dès le 22 octobre pour les titulaires de cartes Mastercard). Inscrivez-vous dès maintenant !

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 56 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

4 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

27 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Springboks have something you don't have The Springboks have something you don't have
Search