Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Pas de carton rouge de 20 minutes à la Coupe du Monde de Rugby

(Photo by Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Contrairement à des informations qui circulaient dernièrement, la variante aux règles du jeu surnommée « carton rouge de 20 minutes » ne sera pas appliquée lors de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby qui se tiendra en France du 8 septembre au 28 octobre.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ces dernières semaines, plusieurs médias ont fait état de spéculations sur les réseaux sociaux concernant la mise en œuvre potentielle de cette règle relative au carton rouge de 20 minutes qui pourrait être applicable lors de la prochaine Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

Cette variante des règles du jeu, également connue sous le nom de « carton orange », permet à un joueur exclu d’être remplacé stratégiquement par un remplaçant après 20 minutes. Cependant, World Rugby a officiellement confirmé que cette règle ne serait pas appliquée lors du prestigieux tournoi qui se déroulera en France cette année.

Le concept du carton rouge à 20 minutes est apparu dans le cadre d’un essai pendant la compétition de Super Rugby, visant à trouver un équilibre entre la discipline des joueurs et l’assurance que les équipes ne sont pas indûment désavantagées par un carton rouge qui serait distribué trop tôt dans la rencontre.

Dans le cadre de cette expérimentation, un joueur ayant reçu un carton rouge pour faute pouvait être remplacé temporairement par un remplaçant après avoir passé 20 minutes hors du terrain. Cette substitution tactique visait à trouver un compromis entre la nécessité de maintenir la compétitivité de la rencontre et celle de sanctionner les infractions graves aux règles du jeu.

Bien que l’essai ait suscité intérêt et débat, il ne sera pas étendu à la Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

En outre, la règle du carton rouge de 20 minutes n’a pas été testée lors du dernier Championnat U20 World Rugby qui s’est déroulé en Afrique du Sud.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search