Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Quatre changements pour l'Uruguay en vue de la Namibie

LILLE, FRANCE - SEPTEMBER 14: Baltazar Amaya of Uruguay scores his team's second try during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between France and Uruguay at Stade Pierre Mauroy on September 14, 2023 in Lille, France. (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

Le sélectionneur Esteban Meneses a effectué quatre changements dans son équipe de départ par rapport à l’équipe qui a perdu 38-17 face à l’Italie : deux avants et deux trois-quarts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dans le détail, Diego Arbelo remplace Ignacio Peculo en première ligne après être entré en cours de match pour jouer 21 minutes face à l’Italie la semaine dernière.

Carlos Deus remplace Manuel Diana en troisième ligne. Il s’agit de la troisième titularisation de sa carrière, la première depuis le dernier match contre la Namibie au mois d’août.

Felipe Arcos Perez fera ses débuts en Coupe du Monde de Rugby en remplacement de Tomas Inciarte au centre. Sa dernière sélection remonte au match contre la Namibie, où il avait reçu un carton jaune.

Enfin, Bautista Basso remplace Gaston Mieres au poste d’ailier droit. Il retrouve sa place de titulaire après avoir disputé 14 minutes contre l’Italie en sortie de banc.

XV de départ

1 Mateo Sanguinetti
2 German Kessler
3 Diego Arbelo
4 Felipe Aliaga
5 Manuel Leindekar
6 Manuel Ardao
7 Santiago Civetta
8 Carlos Deus
9 Santiago Arata
10 Felipe Etcheverry
11 Nicolas Freitas
12 Andres Vilaseca (cap.)
13 Felipe Arcos Perez
14 Bautista Basso
15 Baltazar Amaya

Remplaçants

16 Guillermo Pujadas
17 Facundo Gattas
18 Reinaldo Piussi
19 Juan Manuel Rodríguez
20 Eric Dosantos
21 Agustin Ormaechea
22 Felipe Berchesi
23 Juan Manuel Alonso

Rencontre
Coupe du Monde de Rugby
Uruguay
36 - 26
Temps complet
Namibia
Toutes les stats et les données

Comme on se retrouve

Il reste 13 joueurs de l’équipe qui avait affronté la Namibie au mois d’août, dont neuf feront partie du XV de départ : Mateo Sanguinetti, German Kessler, Diego Arbelo, Manuel Leindekar, Santiago Civetta, Carlos Deus, Felipe Arcos Perez, Bautista Basso et le capitaine Andrés Vilaseca.

Trois des quatre marqueurs d’essai du dernier match entre les deux équipes seront sur la feuille de match : Felipe Arcos Perez, Santiago Civetta et Carlos Deus.

ADVERTISEMENT

À l’occasion de cette rencontre, Santiago Civetta avait réalisé une performance dominante avec un essai et une passe décisive à son compteur personnel et un total de onze plaquages à 100 % de réussite.

C’est contre la Namibie à Windhoek en 2017 que Santiago Arata a inscrit le seul doublé de sa carrière internationale.  Aucun Uruguayen n’a jamais marqué plus d’un essai dans un même match de Coupe du Monde de Rugby.

Vilaseca à la manoeuvre

Le capitaine Andrés Vilaseca est le joueur uruguayen qui a disputé le plus de minutes dans l’histoire de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby. Il n’a manqué que 67 minutes en 10 matchs depuis 2015, soit 6,7 minutes par match.

Felipe Etcheverry est l’auteur des trois passes décisives effectuées par l’Uruguay dans cette Coupe du Monde de Rugby, dont deux à l’intention de Nicolas Freitas.

Avec deux essais inscrits, Nicolas Freitas est le meilleur marqueur d’essais de l’Uruguay à la RWC 2023. Aucun joueur uruguayen n’a jamais inscrit trois essais en RWC. Freitas partage ce record de deux essais avec son coéquipier Manuel Diana (deux essais inscrits lors de Japon 2019), l’actuel sélectionneur du Chili Pablo Lemoine (deux en 2003) et l’ancien arrière Alfonso Cardoso (un en 1999 et un en 2003).

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search