Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Les Tonga repartent avec leur seule victoire

LILLE, FRANCE - OCTOBER 08: Ben Tameifuna of Tonga is tackled by Fonovai Tangimana of Romania during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between Tonga and Romania at Stade Pierre Mauroy on October 08, 2023 in Lille, France. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Qualifiées pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 sur un terrain de la Sunshine Coast en Australie le 23 juillet 2022, les Tonga ont achevé leur campagne au stade Pierre-Mauroy de Lille par une victoire 45-24 sur la Roumanie dans le dernier match de la poule B devant 45 042 spectateurs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Le principal enjeu de cette rencontre entre les deux équipes du bas de tableau était de ne pas repartir sans avoir remporter au moins une victoire. Entre la 15e équipe mondiale (Tonga) et la 19e (Roumanie), le niveau était sensiblement équilibré, les deux équipes comptant deux victoires et deux défaites chacune depuis leur première rencontre en 2013.

Rencontre
Coupe du Monde de Rugby
Tonga
45 - 24
Temps complet
Romania
Toutes les stats et les données

Les Tonga n’ont jamais quitté une Coupe du Monde sans au moins une victoire, depuis 2003 alors que la dernière victoire de la Roumanie remontait à 2015 (non qualifiée pour l’édition 2019 au Japon) contre le Canada.

Pour sa septième et dernière année à la tête des îliens, l’ancien international Toutai Kefu (champion du monde en 1999 avec l’Australie) aura pu se satisfaire de l’engagement aussi bien de ses avants que de ses trois-quarts, chacun replissant bien son rôle.

Affrontement équilibré

Le profil équilibré des deux équipes s’est senti dès les premières minutes avec un jeu concentré autour de la ligne médiane pendant près de sept minutes. Un premier franchissement du trois-quarts centre de Clermont George Moala, par ailleurs ancien joueur des All Blacks, a permis de basculer dans l’autre camp. Quelques temps de jeu plus tard, l’ailier Solomone Kata déposait tranquillement (10e).

Graphique d'évolution des points

Tonga gagne +21
Temps passé en tête
73
Minutes passées en tête
0
89%
% du match passés en tête
0%
43%
Possession sur les 10 dernières minutes
57%
5
Points sur les 10 dernières minutes
0

Face à une défense peu résistante, les Tonga ont poussé leur avantage d’abord avec Moala (14e), puis l’ailier Afusipa Taumoepeau (21e).

En retour, les Roumains ont construit avec détermination, tentant des mouvements audacieux comme cette touche captée dans la zone des 5 mètres qui amena à l’essai du troisième-ligne aile Cristi Boboc (29e), seulement le deuxième essai de son équipe dans cette campagne.

L’écart se réduit

Profitant de la suspension de Vaea Fifita pour plaquage haut (32e), les Chênes ont enfoncé le clou avec le demi de mêlée Florin Surugiu chaudement félicité par chacun de ses quatorze coéquipiers (35e) pour sortir à la pause avec seulement quatre points de retard (21-17).

Un écart confirmé au début de la seconde période – essai de Sione Vailanu (49e) auquel a répondu Marius Simionescu (55e) – jusqu’à ce que le centre du Stade Toulousain Pita Akhi ne rouvre une brèche (62e) dans laquelle s’engouffrera Kata pour compléter son doublé (66e), puis Kyren Taumoefolau (71e) pour sceller le score 45-24.

ADVERTISEMENT

Momentum

0'
HT
FT
Tonga
Romania

Relativement actifs et incisifs jusqu’à l’heure de jeu, les Chênes ont progressivement ployé face à leurs puissants adversaires, totalement prisonniers de leur camp. Maigre satisfaction de leur côté pour avoir marqué 24 points en un match, soit leur total le plus élevé depuis 2011 (contre l’Ecosse).

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search