Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Transferts : Joe Cokanasiga et Adré Smith attirent l’attention de clubs français

(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Quelques jours après l’annonce sur RugbyPass que Bath aurait fait une grosse proposition pour rapatrier Henry Arundell, ancien arrière de la sélection de l’Angleterre, en Gallagher Premiership, une autre pointure anglaise pourrait faire le chemin inverse.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

L’ancien ailier anglais Joe Cokanasiga, actuellement sous contrat avec Bath jusqu’en 2027, commence à attirer l’attention de clubs français. À 27 ans, le joueur d’origine fidjienne a inscrit 35 essais en 95 matchs depuis son arrivée en provenance de London Irish en 2018.

Bien qu’il ait récemment prolongé son contrat, les spéculations sur un éventuel départ persistent. Toutefois, avec deux ans restants à son engagement, les prétendants pourraient devoir patienter.

De son côté, le deuxième ligne sud-africain Adré Smith, 27 ans, pourrait quitter les Stormers à la fin de la saison. Avec près de 50 apparitions sous leurs couleurs depuis 2019, il suscite l’intérêt de clubs français et japonais.

Bien qu’il soit sous contrat jusqu’en 2027, son profil circule activement dans les cercles du Top 14 et de la League One japonaise, laissant présager un éventuel transfert prochain.

Sam Davies s’éloigne des Tigers

Par ailleurs, les Leicester Tigers devront revoir leurs plans pour renforcer leur charnière. L’ancien demi d’ouverture gallois Sam Davies, actuellement à Grenoble, a décliné une offre pour rejoindre Welford Road à la fin de son contrat l’été prochain.

Sam Davies, 31 ans et fils de l’ancien international gallois Nigel Davies, a fait un choix fort en refusant l’offre des Leicester Tigers. Arrivé à Grenoble en 2023 après des passages aux Ospreys et aux Dragons, le demi d’ouverture gallois a inscrit 84 points en neuf matchs (en plus des 243 en 25 matchs la saison dernière) et a prolongé son contrat avec les leaders de Pro D2 jusqu’en 2027. Leicester devra donc chercher une alternative pour remplacer Jamie Shillcock.

Cet article a été publié initialement sur RugbyPass.com et adapté en français par Willy Billiard.

ADVERTISEMENT


Vous souhaitez être parmi les premiers à vous procurer des billets pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2027 en Australie ? Inscrivez-vous ici.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search