World Rugby revoit ses protocoles relatifs aux protège-dents connectés

Par RugbyPass
(Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

World Rugby a révisé temporairement ses directives concernant les protège-dents connectés à la suite de difficultés rencontrées avec la nouvelle technologie destinée à détecter les commotions cérébrales chez les joueurs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Des problèmes ont en effet surgi en ce qui concerne le laps de temps entre les incidents et la transmission du signal d’alerte aux médecins sur le terrain.

Gregor Townsend, le sélectionneur de l’équipe d’Écosse, avait exprimé des inquiétudes après que deux de ses joueurs clés aient dû quitter le terrain pour subir des évaluations de commotion cérébrale déclenchées par les protège-dents lors des matchs du Tournoi des Six Nations.

Ils ont ensuite été autorisés à reprendre la partie après avoir été jugés aptes.

Dans le cadre des nouvelles directives, qui seront en vigueur dès ce week-end, les médecins seront autorisés à effectuer des évaluations sur le terrain pour déterminer si une évaluation immédiate du protocole commotion est nécessaire.

Si ce n’est pas le cas, l’évaluation aura lieu soit à la mi-temps, soit à la fin du match, en fonction du moment où l’alerte est donnée.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

j
johnz 48 minutes ago
All Blacks player ratings vs England | Steinlager Ultra Low Carb Series first Test

I was excited about the Razor error, but a few things are bothering me about this team. It’s looking less like a bright new dawn, and more like a conservative look to the past. We’ll never know how much pressure comes from above to select established players, but imagine if Razor wiped the slate clean and created the new baby blacks, the financial hit to NZR would be huge. Not that such drastic measures are needed, but a few selections still puzzle. TJ and Christie. Neither look like bright picks for the future, both are experienced but with limitations. I understand why you would pick one as a safe pair of hands, but why both? Jacobson is no impact player, and it makes no sense to me why you would pick both Blackadder and Jacobson in the same squad. They cover pretty much the same positions, and Jacobson has never demanded a start. Blackadder has struggled to stay on the field, but if he is picked, play him. Let’s see what he can do, we know enough about Jacobson, and Blackadder has far more mongrel. I would have preferred to see Lakai in the squad, he offers a point of difference and the energy of youth. Plus he would have kept Papali’i honest and created tasty competition for the 7 jersey. Ioane. The experiment goes on. The bloke is a fantastic winger but still fails to convince as a centre. Has NZR invested so much money in him that there’s pressure to play him? Proctor was by far the better player all season and played next to Barrett. Play him; a specialised centre, in form. Crazy I know. Our two wingers are very good, but we still miss a power runner in the backline. Faiga’anuki was a big loss and could have filled that role at wing or 13. More money on young players like him and less on aging stars would not go amiss in NZ rugby. Perofeta had a decent game, but the jury is still out. The lack of a specialist fullback in the squad is another head scratcher. Admittedly it’s early days and a win is a win, but hopefully some more innovation is in the plan otherwise I see this squad struggling sooner or later.

13 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Junior Boks explanation for their heavy defeat to Argentina The Junior Boks explanation for their heavy defeat to Argentina
Search