Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'12 months rehabbing for a World Cup you wouldn’t play in'- Quade Cooper

Australia's head coach Eddie Jones (R) talks with Quade Cooper prior to the Rugby Championship and Bledisloe Cup Test match between Australia and New Zealand at Forsyth Barr Stadium in Dunedin on August 5, 2023. (Photo by Sanka Vidanagama / AFP) (Photo by SANKA VIDANAGAMA/AFP via Getty Images)

Australia fly-half Quade Cooper addressed the Wallabies’ World Cup pool stage exit for the first time on social media after playing his first match since missing out on Eddie Jones’ squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 35-year-old was one of the shock omissions from the 33-player squad that travelled to France alongside former captain Michael Hooper as Jones opted for a young and inexperienced team instead.

While Cooper did comment after missing out on the World Cup initially, he has refrained from confronting the Wallabies’ World Cup these last few weeks as his former teammates crashed out in the pool stages for the first time ever following losses to Wales and Fiji.

Video Spacer

New Zealand post-match presser 14-10-2023

Video Spacer

New Zealand post-match presser 14-10-2023

But after playing his first game after that disappointment, a preseason match for the Hanazono Kintetsu Liners against the Melbourne Rebels, the 80-cap Wallaby reflected on the past few weeks, and year in general.

After rupturing his Achilles against Argentina in August 2022, Cooper faced a race to be fit for the World Cup, and was able to recover in time to play in this year’s Rugby Championship only to then fail to make the World Cup as Jones opted for the untested duo of Carter Gordon and Ben Donaldson.

Cooper mentioned these “highs and lows” in an Instagram post before presenting the stark reality of his past year in a dig that appears to be aimed directly at Jones.

“After the high and lows of the past 3 months it was good to be back out on the field,” he said. “12 months rehabbing for a World Cup you wouldn’t play in. Keep your goals based around the process not the outcome.”

ADVERTISEMENT

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by QC (@quadecooper)


Watching the Wallabies struggle in France would have presumably made his absence all the harder to take for Cooper, as he would have felt he could have made a difference. Jones has faced a lot of criticism in the wake of the World Cup, and Cooper has not opted to kick him while he’s down but he has nevertheless has not hidden how disappointed he is.

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
C
Cam 644 days ago

I was quite dissapointed not to see Quade (or Hooper) selected and play in what would have been his last WC but would it have made any difference though? His experience and what he brings to the game might have been that spark the Wallabies needed. Pure speculation on my part.

R
Rich 646 days ago

If any lessons on experience in a squad were needed, look at the Boks.

T
TOA-MATE-KORE 646 days ago

Should have been at the world cup. And Hooper. Everybody knows it. Except the dipshit running the show.

T
Tom 647 days ago

Another in the long line of those shafted by Eddie. Would have been good to see Quade play and it seems he's turned himself around. Sad to see him and Cipriani sabotage their careers and learn their lessons too late in the day.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse' 'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'