Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The day England’s WAGS wound up the Scots

Craig Chalmers of Sctoland kicks into the wind, with the aid of teammate Gavin Hastings during the Five Nations match at Murrayfield in Edinbrugh. Scotland won the match 13-7. Mandatory Credit: Allsport

Scotland legend Iwan Tukalo has recalled how the sight of England’s wives and girlfriends on the hallowed Murrayfield turf got the blood boiling before it properly kicked off in the 1990 Grand Slam decider.

ADVERTISEMENT

Already fired-up by an emotional squad gathering and ‘Everest-type’ speech by coach Jim Telfer, Scotland left their base at the Braid Hills Hotel in Edinburgh determined to send England home to think again.

But further fuel was added to the pre-match fire when Scotland’s players spotted their opposite numbers’ partners being interviewed live on TV in the corner of the pitch.

“Before kick-off, we went out on the pitch in our blazers as normal to see what the conditions were like and we could see, over in the far corner, the girlfriends and wives of the England team being interviewed on TV. That was another thing that fuelled us because, in our mind, they hadn’t earned the right to set foot on the sacred turf of Murrayfield,” the winger recalled in the My Life in Rugby column, published in The Rugby Paper last month.

Tukalo, who scored 15 tries in 37 Tests and started all four matches in the Grand Slam-winning campaign, also described how the biggest day of their rugby lives had started much more serenely.

Telfer and fellow coach Ian McGeechan had shielded the players from the Press in the week and instead thrown the spotlight on England as the favourites to complete the clean sweep.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as Tukalo and room-mate, David Sole, packed their bags to prepare to go downstairs to one last team meeting before departure to Murrayfield, they were left in no uncertain terms about the magnitude of the match.

“We were warned off talking to press to make sure we didn’t give England any ammunition, while all the time the coaches talked them up,” Tukalo recalled.

Ivan Tukalo
Iwan Tukalo of Scotland in action against Western Samoa during the Rugby Union World Cup Quarter-final held at Murrayfield, Edinburgh on 19th October 1991. Scotland won 28-6. (Photo by Bob Thomas Sports Photography via Getty Images).

“On the day of the game itself. I was sharing a room with David Sole at the Braid Hills Hotel and Soley, who didn’t say much at the best of times, was quieter than ever. You could hear a pin drop and that was making me more and more nervous.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So I asked him if he minded me putting on the TV as a distraction while we started to pack our bags, The credits for Grandstand started and the programme opened up with a montage of great Scotland-England sporting encounters. We stopped what we were doing and looked at each other and went “oh my god!”. It suddenly dawned on us how big a deal it all was.”

Tukalo added: “When we went down to the team room, there was a Scotland jersey placed on each of the chairs in a circle, one for each player. The number wasn’t showing, just the thistle.

“Creamy (Telfer) told us to sing ‘Flower of Scotland’ and after we’d done that, he told us to pick up a jersey and present it to the relevant player. I got No.6, JJ’s (John Jeffrey), and as I gave it to him, I said, ‘I won’t let you down, I’ll be there’.

“When we all walked out of that room, we knew that each and every one of us was not going to leave anything out on that park. In our mind, it was our day, come hell or high water. I’m getting emotional thinking about it now.”

Sole’s slow march out of the Murrayfield tunnel is the stuff of Calcutta Cup legend and Tukalo, who was the last in line, says the noise of the crowd that day will stay with him forever.

“I was the last in line as always; it was a superstition of mine. So by the time I made it onto the pitch the noise was just incredible.

“I’d played at Murrayfield several times before but I had never heard anything like that. The crowd never let up throughout the 80 minutes, every yard of ground we made they were behind us.

Tony Stanger’s try and three Craig Chalmers penalties were enough to beat an England team that went up blind alley after blind alley, only creating one real moment of magic in attack when Jerry Guscott broke through to score.

“A combination of the crowd, everyone giving 120 per cent and England getting transfixed on trying to do stuff they wouldn’t normally do, helped us to get us the (13-7) win,” said Tukalo, who’s 5’9 tall and weighed around 12 stone at the time.

“I’m just glad it was Tony Stanger who got the chance down his wing because I’d have never been able to reach up that high and grab the ball, the short arse that I am!”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 306 days ago

Turf wasn’t that “hallowed” a year later when Big Gav spooned his penalty from in front of the posts to gift England a place in the RWC final! I suppose that was the WAGS’ fault as well!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search