Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

26 weeks worth of bans handed out - ranging from spitting to alleged racist abuse

EPCR Champions Cup flag (Getty Images)

The EPCR has been busy sanctioning multiple players for misdemeanors during the Heineken Champions Cup, Challenge Cup and Continental Shield.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bans total out at 26 weeks with players and coaches pulled up for offences which included spitting and racist abuse, among others, and were punished following various independent disciplinary hearings in Paris.

16 weeks-worth of bans were handed out from one particularly feisty match.

In the Champions Cup Castres Olympique replacement prop, Tudor Stroe, has been suspended for three weeks following arising from his club’s Round 5 match against Exeter Chiefs at Sandy Park.

Stroe was sent off by the referee, George Clancy (Ireland), in the 59th minute of the match for striking the Exeter Chiefs centre, Ollie Devoto, with his arm in contravention of Law 9.12.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Gareth Graham (England), Chair, Leon Lloyd (England) and Frank Hadden (Scotland), heard evidence and submissions from Stroe, who accepted the red card decision, from the Castres Olympique Managing Director, Matthias Rolland, and from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

The Committee upheld the red card decision and found that the act of foul play was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and selected six weeks as the appropriate entry point.

As there were no aggravating factors, and due to Stroe’s guilty plea and early expression of remorse, the Committee reduced the sanction by the maximum amount of 50% before imposing a suspension of three weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stroe is free to play on Monday, 18 February 2019 and both he and EPCR have the right to appeal the decision.

In the Challenge Cup Perpignan replacement prop, Nicolas Lemaire, has been suspended for seven weeks arising from last weekend’s match against Bordeaux-Bègles at Stade Aimé Giral.

Lemaire was cited by the match Citing Commissioner, Wayne Sheridan (Ireland), for tackling the Bordeaux-Bègles wing, Nicolas Plazy, in a dangerous lifting manner in the 62nd minute of the match in contravention of Law 9.18. The player was shown a yellow card by the referee, Karl Dickson (England), following the incident.

An independent Disciplinary Committee accepted the charge of foul play, from the Perpignan legal representative, Pierre Becque, and from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Committee upheld the complaint as Lemaire’s tackle warranted a red card and found that the act of foul play was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and selected 10 weeks as the appropriate entry point.

Taking into consideration the player’s poor disciplinary record, the Committee decided to reduce the sanction by only three weeks before imposing a seven-week suspension, which means he currently won’t be available until March 25th.

But it’s in the Continental Shield where the heaviest punishment has been meted out, with the Femi-CZ Rugby Rovigo coach, Umberto Casellato, suspended for eight weeks for verbal abuse.

The incident happened during the club’s Continental Shield, Round 5 match against Argos Rugby Petrarca at the Argos Arena.

Casellato was shown a red card and ordered to leave the playing area by the referee, Shota Tevzadze (Georgia), for verbally abusing the Argos Rugby Petrarca scrum half, Jeremy Su’a, during the second half of the match in contravention of Law 9.12.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Jean-Noel Couraud (France), Chair, Frank Hadden (Scotland) and Achille Reali (Italy) heard evidence and submissions from Casellato, from the Femi-CZ Rugby Rovigo representative, Joe van Niekerk, from the club’s legal representatives, Lanfranco Massimi and Federico Cogo, as well as from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

In evidence, Casellato accepted that he had verbally abused the Argos Rugby Petrarca player, but denied that the abuse was racist.

The Committee upheld the red card decision and determined that the abuse had been racist. It found that the offence was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and selected 12 weeks as the appropriate entry point.

There were no aggravating factors and taking into consideration Casellato’s qualified guilty plea and his good disciplinary record, the Committee reduced the sanction by four weeks before imposing a match-day stadium ban of eight weeks.

Casellato is free to resume his match-day duties on March 18th.

He wasn’t the only person to be punished from that game, the Argos Rugby Petrarca prop, Romulo Acosta, has been suspended for eight weeks.

Acosta was cited by the match Citing Commissioner, Gabriele Pezzano (Italy), for allegedly spitting at the Femi-CZ Rugby Rovigo wing, Massimo Cioffi, at the conclusion of the match in contravention of Law 9.27.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Jean-Noel Couraud, Chair, Achille Reali (Italy) and Julien Berenger (France), heard evidence and submissions by video conference from Acosta, who pleaded not guilty to the charge, from the Argos Rugby Petrarca representative, Silvia Cameran, and from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

The Committee upheld the citing complaint in that it warranted a red card and determined that Acosta had spat at the Femi-CZ Rugby Rovigo player. It found that the offence was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and selected eight weeks as the appropriate entry point.

One week was added due to Acosta’s poor disciplinary record, and in mitigation, the Committee then reduced the sanction by one week in recognition of the player’s coaching work with his club’s underage teams before imposing a suspension of eight weeks.

Acosta is free to play again on March 25th.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
J
JW 11 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search