Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

3 hot takes as Andy Farrell names Ireland team to play Wales

(Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

For the major headline in the Ireland team selection to face Wales in Guinness Six Nations round one, look no further than the absence of the name of Tadhg Furlong from the teamsheet. A starting British and Irish Lions tighthead in all six Test matches on their last two tours, the value of the 30-year-old to Farrell’s Ireland pack is inestimable.

ADVERTISEMENT

He had only played once for Leinster, the first half of a mid-October URC game at Connacht, when he was thrust into the limelight as one of the few Farrell picks to start all three of the Ireland Autumn Nations Series matches.

Furlong was even made a first-time skipper for the mid-series win over Fiji and while he returned to Leinster fit and ready to embrace their hectic December/January programme, he pulled up lame when subbing on December 3 versus Ulster.

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns’ Six Nations Preview – Borthwick & Sinfield to Revolutionise England | Offload Ep 62

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns’ Six Nations Preview – Borthwick & Sinfield to Revolutionise England | Offload Ep 62

He since suffered an unrelated calf issue and the outcome of all this inactivity was his absence from the Ireland teamsheet when it was unveiled at their Portugal training base before flying into Cardiff later on Thursday.

It was a disappointment. Furlong had publicised his expectation that he would be fit when he did some media the day before the recent January 21 Leinster win in Dublin over Racing in the Heineken Champions Cup, but things with his calf didn’t progress sufficiently for him to be included in the match day 23 versus Wales.

Related

What it heralds is a massive benchmark in the career of Finlay Bealham. The 31-year-old is no rookie in the sense that he has 27 Test caps to his name, but just four of those appearances have been as a starter and the last time he wore the No3 jersey was in the July 2021 win over Japan when Furlong was in South Africa with the Lions.

Bealham’s previous start before the Japanese – versus Georgia in November 2020 – could have spelled the end of his Test career as the Ireland scrum was massively troubled and the team hugely criticised by an unimpressed Farrell, but he has put in some impressive cameos off the bench in recent times. Namely in the tour series win over New Zealand last July and in the November win over South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

That is all very well and good when it comes to subbing but now comes his litmus test – can he be a reliable starter now that Furlong is laid up? Much like the backup behind Johnny Sexton at out-half, there are issues with the depth of what exists at tighthead in Ireland and this is borne out by Farrell naming the four-cap Tom O’Toole on the replacements bench. Warren Gatland will be delighted, hoping the scrum is now an area where Wales can positively go after Ireland on Saturday.

O’Mahony 24 months on from seeing red
The no Furlong situation will ensure Ireland will be on their toes in Cardiff but that was surely always going to be the case given the memory of what they miserably endured two years ago when they last visited. Ireland certainly weren’t the potent outfit they have since become under Farrell’s stewardship, but they still arrived at the Principality 24 months ago as the favourites to take an opening round victory and launch a tilt at the title.

How wrong that assumption was. With Peter O’Mahony red-carded early on, Wales instead engineered an ambush victory and they – not Ireland – went on to win the title, an achievement that came within a whisker of being a Grand Slam triumph only for the concession of a late try in France.

O’Mahony is named at blindside in this Saturday’s Ireland team and it will be incumbent on him to be on his best behaviour and ensure he is seen in his best light. After his 2021 red card, the feeling was that he could easily have slipped down the pecking order with so many younger back-rowers flourishing in the Irish system.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, at the age of 33, O’Mahony has shown to Farrell in recent times that he is determined not to relinquish his spot and he is now quite a positive point of difference to what the likes of Josh van der Flier and Caelan Doris bring to the back row party.

The balance this trio provides has been excellent for Ireland. Now all that is needed is for the inspiring O’Mahony to concentrate on just being effective for his team and not get sidetracked by the verbals and the shape-throwing that often exist in matches versus the Welsh.

McCloskey’s sudden indispensability
Saturday will be a welcome back for James Lowe following his absence for the entire Autumn Nations Series through a calf injury. The 30-year-old with the big left boot has been an immense presence for Farrell’s Ireland when available and while the rookie Jimmy O’Brien was undoubtedly encouraging with how he went in November, the jersey was always set to revert to Lowe if he turned up fit and ready to train in Portugal, which he was. His booming clearances should keep Liam Williams, called up by Wales on Thursday at full-back for the injured Leigh Halfpenny, busy.

While the Irish recall of Lowe was no surprise, the continuing occupancy by Stuart McCloskey of the No12 shirt is intriguing. True, Robbie Henshaw is still sidelined with injury, but McCloskey seemed destined not that long ago to be a journeyman Test name, someone that rarely if ever played.

That was the way he was treated by Joe Schmidt since a 2016 debut and despite his obvious ability to offload in the tackle and to consistently break the gainline, Farrell seemed to be of a similar opinion as Schmidt in not much considering the Ulster midfielder as a genuine international-level pick.

That impression has now radically changed with the 30-year-old McCloskey having started all three of the recent November matches and he has kept the No12 shirt for the trip to the Principality, demonstrating that Ireland does have an option outside of the Garry Ringrose-Henshaw-Bundee Aki triumvirate that had dominated the selection since late 2017. Aki, who bench in the third November match versus Australia after a suspension has expired, is the bench backup at the Principality, with McCloskey chosen to partner Garry Ringrose.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 11 minutes ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Too much to deal with in one reply JW!

No problem, I hope it wasn't too hard a read and thanks for replying. As always, just throwing ideas out for there for others to contemplate.


Well fatigue was actually my first and main point! I just want others to come to that conclusion themselves rather than just feeding it to them lol


I can accept that South Africa have a ball in play stat that correlates with a lower fitness/higher strength team, but I don't necessarily buy the argument that one automatically leads to the other. I'd suspect their two stats (high restart numbers low BIPs) likely have separate causes.


Graham made a great point about crescendos. These are what people call momentum swings these days. The build up in fatigue is a momentum swing. The sweeping of the ball down the field in multiple phases is a momentum swing. What is important is that these are far too easily stopped by fake injuries or timely replacements, and that they can happen regularly enough that extending game time (through stopping the clock) becomes irrelevant. It has always been case that to create fatigue play needs to be continuous. What matters is the Work to Rest ratio exceeding 70 secs and still being consistent at the ends of games.


Qualities in bench changes have a different effect, but as their use has become quite adept over time, not so insignificant changes that they should be ignored, I agree. The main problem however is that teams can't dictate the speed of the game, as in, any team can dictate how slow it becomes if they really want to, but the team in possession (they should even have some capability to keep the pace up when not in possession) are too easily foiled when the want to play with a high tempo.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

The essence of rugby a fair physical competition for the ball?

No, that's describing League. Rugby is a beautiful game about executing scoring maneuvers. You should take up league, right up your ally as a physical contest imo.

If that is so using the scrum as just a reset takes out the competitiveness

If we forget (or even use to help understand) your first question, I still don't understand where you're going/what you're thinking.


What do you mean by just a reset? Like league where the ball is rolled/placed at the 8s feet to play with? I don't agree with any of those crazy suggestions here (even as a reward to the team that wins the scrum, I'm not even sure it would be a reward), no ones talking about depowering the scrum. At least not in this article/instance.

If there is no penalty for being beaten in the scrum we might as well just restart with a tap

To who? The team that was previously in possession? A scrum is a means of contesting for possession after play stops in open field (as apposed to when the ball goes dead, where it's a lineout). Are you proposing that core basis of the game is removed? I think it would make a much better game to just remove the knock on, as someone has already said, scrums resulting in a penalty as punishment for knocking the ball on is ridiculous. If you want to turnover the ball when someone looses it, you simply have to regather it before they do. That's how ever other game I can think of other than League works. So just get rid of the problem at the roots, it would be a much better "drastic" change than removing the contest from restarts.

In the lineout ruck and maul successful competition gets rewarded and illegal competition gets penalised no one is arguing about that. So is the scrum different?

No one is arguing that removal from scrums either. It is the plethora of nothing offences, the judgmental "technical" decisions by a referee, that are in the middle that are being targeted. Of course this is not a unique problem to scrums, lineouts will result in penalties simply from a contact of arms by jumpers, or rucks whenever a play hangs an arm over someones shoulder when cleaning them out. This article is about tackling the 'major' offences hindering the quality of the game.


But other than these questions, if you want to know my main opinions in my post you will see I agree that the ball should need (always and in every type of circumstance) to be played if it is available at scrum time.


Otherwise the TLDR of all my comments (even thoughts in general) on this particular question is that I agree advantage should be had in instances were the team with the ball 'won' the 'advantage' and where some sort of advantage was 'taken' away. In this respect the scrum had to be rolling forward to win an advantage. But I'm flexible in that if it speeds up the game to award a penatly, that's great, but if they also stop the clock for scrums, I'm happy with way instead. That is very few instances by the way, the majority of the time the ball is able to be played however.


The big question I have asked Bull about is what advantage or opportunity was taken away from a strong scrumming team when opposition causes the scrum to collapse? What sort of advantage was taken away that they need to be a penalty reward, that would seem to be way over the top for most offences to me.


So on that point, I'll like your perspective on a couple of things. How do you think lineouts compare to scrums? Do they offer you enough reward for dominance, and do you think all such meaningless offences should be lessoned (slips or pops while going backwards, contact with the jumper, closing the game, good cleanouts to some fool whos ducked his head in a ruck etc)?

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs La Rochelle | Investec Champions Cup Leinster player ratings vs La Rochelle | Investec Champions Cup
Search