Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

3 hot takes as Gregor Townsend names Scotland team to host Wales

Scotland's Zander Fagerson is red-carded versus Wales in 2021 (Photo by Paul Devlin/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Scotland were exceptional in attack last weekend, beating England with a heartwarming zest to register yet another Calcutta Cup victory, but Gregor Townsend knows his team must now build on that fantastic start by doubling up in the W column when much-changed Wales visit Edinburgh on Saturday. Here are three RugbyPass hot takes on the Guinness Six Nations selection announced on Thursday:

ADVERTISEMENT

Oops!… Don’t do it again
Hard to credit that it is more than 20 years since Britney Spears was rocking the pop charts with ‘Oops!… I Did It Again’. It’s a tune that Scotland will hope won’t be messing with their heads this weekend. Twice they have beaten the English in the championship round one, twice they have demoralizingly stuffed it up the following week versus the Welsh.

Third time lucky? They will very much wish so and they have pinned their ambitions on the recalled Zander Fagerson being a charm on this occasion. It was two years ago, just seven days after Scotland had won away to England, that the tighthead endured the horrible ordeal of getting sent off and seeing his team go on to lose.

Video Spacer

Finn Russell – Calcutta Cup hero on his words with Owen Farrell | England v Scotland | Offload Ep 63

Video Spacer

Finn Russell – Calcutta Cup hero on his words with Owen Farrell | England v Scotland | Offload Ep 63

Now fit after his winter injury issues with Glasgow, Fagerson is the sole change to the starting XV that won in London and how apt would it be that his return coincides with Scotland getting that elusive win over Wales?

The inclusion of the front-rower sees WP Nel, a Twickenham starter, revert to the bench with Simon Berghan missing out. It means that Fagerson will intriguingly find himself scrummaging against Wyn Jones, the Welsh player he clattered into at the ruck to earn that infamous red card 24 months ago. Expect a fascinating head-to-head to unfold.

No handbrake, please
The approach at Twickenham was very much in the give-it-a-lash mould and two things stood out: the cojones of hooker George Turner to throw lineouts beyond his forwards at the set-piece so that players elsewhere could fasten onto the ball at speed, while all four tries were scored by backs in a variety of ways – a dinky kick through the cover, an incredible solo run, an intelligent snip around the ruck, and some brilliant end-to-end handling.

How they probed and stretched the England defence was lovely to watch and there should be no reason why Scotland can’t similarly entertain now that Townsend and co are back in front of the home fans at Murrayfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland had no fear about taking risks at what should have been an intimidating Twickenham and while Wales, with their five changes in the pack, are coming north tooled up to play spoilsport, the effervescence in the likes of Finn Russell and Duhan van der Merwe must be allowed to prosper rather than a tighter, less risky approach getting adopted.

The Scots have shown they have the talent in abundance to entertain, so Townsend, having named 21 of the same match day 23, just needs to let them it again rather than stylishly change tack. Yes, Russell missed six tackles against England, with Sione Tuipulotu missing three in the channel outside him, but what they did on the other side of the ball more than made up for that defensive shortcoming.

Shopping local
When Townsend named his 40-man Six Nations squad in mid-January it was noticeable how 37.5 per cent of his picks – 15 players – played their club rugby outside Scotland. There were 11 attached to English Premiership teams, three to non-Scottish URC sides, and one more over in the French Top 14.

However, that beyond-borders feel to the overall squad hasn’t had as massive an impact on the actual Scotland team chosen by Townsend. Despite changing one starter and one of the bench to face the Welsh, the Scots head into round two with a match day 23 containing just five non-locally based players (21 per cent).

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, the dominant emphasis is on players who ply their trade at either Glasgow or Edinburgh – and the inclusion by Townsend of 18 of them must surely be viewed as a massive vote of confidence in what is being done at those two clubs.

It reinforces that a player can prosper at Test level from those Scottish franchises without having to move to England, France or elsewhere in the URC.

Scotland (vs Wales, Saturday – 4:45pm): Stuart Hogg; Kyle Steyn, Huw Jones, Sione Tuipulotu, Duhan van der Merwe; Finn Russell, Ben White; Pierre Schoeman, George Turner, Zander Fagerson, Richie Gray, Grant Gilchrist, Jamie Ritchie (capt), Luke Crosbie, Matt Fagerson. Reps: Fraser Brown, Jamie Bhatti, WP Nel, Jonny Gray, Jack Dempsey, George Horne, Blair Kinghorn, Chris Harris.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
E
Euan 704 days ago

It's like those articles that describe a game, but fail to mention the score.....

E
Euan 704 days ago

Where's the team you were going to name?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 16 minutes ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Too much to deal with in one reply JW!

No problem, I hope it wasn't too hard a read and thanks for replying. As always, just throwing ideas out for there for others to contemplate.


Well fatigue was actually my first and main point! I just want others to come to that conclusion themselves rather than just feeding it to them lol


I can accept that South Africa have a ball in play stat that correlates with a lower fitness/higher strength team, but I don't necessarily buy the argument that one automatically leads to the other. I'd suspect their two stats (high restart numbers low BIPs) likely have separate causes.


Graham made a great point about crescendos. These are what people call momentum swings these days. The build up in fatigue is a momentum swing. The sweeping of the ball down the field in multiple phases is a momentum swing. What is important is that these are far too easily stopped by fake injuries or timely replacements, and that they can happen regularly enough that extending game time (through stopping the clock) becomes irrelevant. It has always been case that to create fatigue play needs to be continuous. What matters is the Work to Rest ratio exceeding 70 secs and still being consistent at the ends of games.


Qualities in bench changes have a different effect, but as their use has become quite adept over time, not so insignificant changes that they should be ignored, I agree. The main problem however is that teams can't dictate the speed of the game, as in, any team can dictate how slow it becomes if they really want to, but the team in possession (they should even have some capability to keep the pace up when not in possession) are too easily foiled when the want to play with a high tempo.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

The essence of rugby a fair physical competition for the ball?

No, that's describing League. Rugby is a beautiful game about executing scoring maneuvers. You should take up league, right up your ally as a physical contest imo.

If that is so using the scrum as just a reset takes out the competitiveness

If we forget (or even use to help understand) your first question, I still don't understand where you're going/what you're thinking.


What do you mean by just a reset? Like league where the ball is rolled/placed at the 8s feet to play with? I don't agree with any of those crazy suggestions here (even as a reward to the team that wins the scrum, I'm not even sure it would be a reward), no ones talking about depowering the scrum. At least not in this article/instance.

If there is no penalty for being beaten in the scrum we might as well just restart with a tap

To who? The team that was previously in possession? A scrum is a means of contesting for possession after play stops in open field (as apposed to when the ball goes dead, where it's a lineout). Are you proposing that core basis of the game is removed? I think it would make a much better game to just remove the knock on, as someone has already said, scrums resulting in a penalty as punishment for knocking the ball on is ridiculous. If you want to turnover the ball when someone looses it, you simply have to regather it before they do. That's how ever other game I can think of other than League works. So just get rid of the problem at the roots, it would be a much better "drastic" change than removing the contest from restarts.

In the lineout ruck and maul successful competition gets rewarded and illegal competition gets penalised no one is arguing about that. So is the scrum different?

No one is arguing that removal from scrums either. It is the plethora of nothing offences, the judgmental "technical" decisions by a referee, that are in the middle that are being targeted. Of course this is not a unique problem to scrums, lineouts will result in penalties simply from a contact of arms by jumpers, or rucks whenever a play hangs an arm over someones shoulder when cleaning them out. This article is about tackling the 'major' offences hindering the quality of the game.


But other than these questions, if you want to know my main opinions in my post you will see I agree that the ball should need (always and in every type of circumstance) to be played if it is available at scrum time.


Otherwise the TLDR of all my comments (even thoughts in general) on this particular question is that I agree advantage should be had in instances were the team with the ball 'won' the 'advantage' and where some sort of advantage was 'taken' away. In this respect the scrum had to be rolling forward to win an advantage. But I'm flexible in that if it speeds up the game to award a penatly, that's great, but if they also stop the clock for scrums, I'm happy with way instead. That is very few instances by the way, the majority of the time the ball is able to be played however.


The big question I have asked Bull about is what advantage or opportunity was taken away from a strong scrumming team when opposition causes the scrum to collapse? What sort of advantage was taken away that they need to be a penalty reward, that would seem to be way over the top for most offences to me.


So on that point, I'll like your perspective on a couple of things. How do you think lineouts compare to scrums? Do they offer you enough reward for dominance, and do you think all such meaningless offences should be lessoned (slips or pops while going backwards, contact with the jumper, closing the game, good cleanouts to some fool whos ducked his head in a ruck etc)?

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jordie Barrett gesture singled out by Ronan O'Gara after loss Jordie Barrett gesture singled out by Ronan O'Gara after loss
Search