Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A 34 stone centre pairing and six other England midfield options for Eddie to ponder

Farrell and Tuilagi during the England training session held at Pennyhill Park in 2018. (Getty Images)

If the balance and blend of England’s back row is the most talked about topic in regard to the side, the centre combinations can’t be far behind.

ADVERTISEMENT

After Owen Farrell and Jonathan Joseph enjoyed a sublime first year under Eddie Jones, a number of issues have taken root since, such as injuries and an inability to generate front-foot ball, and England’s midfield has been in flux for the last two seasons. Farrell has been a relative mainstay at 12, with the cast changing outside of him, but now with England keen to get him back into his favoured position of fly-half, there is even more uncertainty in the centres.

Defensively, it was an area England struggled in against the Springboks and it will have come under close scrutiny this week, especially with Manu Tuilagi cleared to play and coming off the back of some impressive Gallagher Premiership and Heineken Champions Cup form with Leicester Tigers.

We take a run through England’s possible midfield combinations to take on the All Blacks, looking at each unit’s pros and cons, with it clearly set to be an area where England will be tested by the visitors at Twickenham this weekend.

Continue reading below…

Watch: Sam Underhill goes to the defence of Owen Farrell over his tackle on Andre Esterhuizen.

Video Spacer

 

Owen Farrell-Ben Te’o-Henry Slade

The simplest option for England would be to stick with what they opted for against South Africa.

Offensively, it put together some promising moments, especially in the 20 minutes after half time when England were able to retain possession and up the tempo, but defensively it was vulnerable. In Slade’s eagerness to ensure his wings were never isolated, he would regularly drift out at a pace that Te’o couldn’t match on his inside and when one of Damian de Allende or Jesse Kriel cut back against the grain, Slade would be trusting his inside man to cover, who just wasn’t able to get across quickly enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

Te’o will be sharper this week, having had just 28 minutes of rugby this season going into that game, their understanding of each other will be better and John Mitchell’s influence on the group should only grow with time. As a trio, it provides punch up the middle outside of Farrell and in Slade they have a player more than competent enough to bring the wings into play, via a pass or a kick.

Owen Farrell-Manu Tuilagi-Henry Slade

A slight tinkering that potentially provides a little bit more lateral mobility at inside centre and would prevent England being opened up when New Zealand carriers put their foot in the ground and step back inside.

Jones has said he sees Tuilagi exclusively as a 13 now, which is a fair assessment based on his skills and his performances for Leicester – and previously England – in the outside centre spot, but it would not be the first time he has said one thing and done another in his tenure as head coach.

Tuilagi at inside centre could be a stopgap measure until Te’o gets a little more rugby under his belt this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Owen Farrell-Ben Te’o-Manu Tuilagi

Jones couldn’t, could he?

Going full-on power against New Zealand hasn’t actually hurt England – or South Africa – in the past, but it seems a stretch, especially given how valuable mobility and an ability to link play with the wider channels is at 13.

This feels like a combination that Jones could turn to at about midway through the second half if things aren’t going well for England and they need an injection of impetus. England have never selected such a direct midfield as this under Jones, with a secondary playmaker, either at 12 or 13, consistently a feature of his sides.

 

Ben Te’o (R) issues instructions watched by team mate Manu Tuilagi during the England training session held at Browns Sports Club. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

George Ford-Owen Farrell-Henry Slade

Another midfield that seems equally unlikely given the presence of both Te’o and Tuilagi in England’s retained 25 players, but it is somewhat of a reversion to type for England over the past few seasons.

The problem is that it is so heavy with playmakers that the goal of creating space, the reason why you would select all three of these players, will be made even harder. Without a differing threat in the trio, particularly one that can run hard at the space and draw defenders in, New Zealand should more easily be able to contain the group.

That said, the passing and kicking potential of the trio is excellent and you would back them to find holes and exploit space in behind the New Zealand defensive line. It all just feels a bit too unlikely, however, with the other options England have at their disposal and their previous struggles with combinations of this type.

George Ford-Owen Farrell-Ben Te’o

Do not underestimate the trust that Jones has in Te’o.

The former rugby league man is usually included in England squads the moment he is passed fit and it’s not just Jones, with Warren Gatland having been extremely eager to get him involved with the British and Irish Lions last year, where he enjoyed his fair share of success.

Ben Te’o of the Lions takes on Sam Whitelock and Sonny Bill Williams during the Test match between the New Zealand All Blacks and the British & Irish Lions at Eden Park. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The issue here would again be mobility in that 13 channel and the ability to get across and help out his wings. If New Zealand can suck in defenders with a couple of quick carries up the middle, they have the breakdown nous and decision-makers on the field to get that ball wide quickly and try and turn the corner outside of Te’o, potentially creating two-on-ones or three-on-twos with England’s remaining defenders.

George Ford-Owen Farrell-Manu Tuilagi

The question with this combination would revolve around just how fit is Tuilagi.

He has shown in the recent weeks and months for Leicester that he is still the mobile centre that he was before his injury hell, but is he at or close to 100% at the moment, given that he had a slight groin injury prevent him from featuring against South Africa?

If that injury is completely healed and he is moving as well as he was in the opening two weeks of the Champions Cup, this could be the combination that England fans have been dreaming of for the last two seasons. The playmaker axis with the direct runner outside is a system that has been used successfully before.

Owen Farrell-Henry Slade-Manu Tuilagi

For all the positives of the previous three combinations, it seems counter-productive, having made the decision Farrell is England’s premiere fly-half, to move him back to inside centre after just one week in the driving seat.

The issue here would be how does Slade cope with the responsibilities at 12? On paper, he ticks all the boxes to make you think that it would work, he has plenty of experience in the 10 jersey and he reads the game as quickly as anyone, yet it’s something which has never taken in the few opportunities he has had there.

Maybe those instances for club and country at 12 were anomalies or he was the victim of unfavourable circumstances, but his track record inside is nowhere near as impressive as it is on the outside. That said, having Farrell at 10 and Tuilagi on the outside is a pretty good safety blanket if England were to try it, although it would perhaps be advisable not to give it its first outing against the All Blacks.

Watch: Chris Ashton talks about life back in the England camp.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 35 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

4 Go to comments
J
JW 50 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Kazuki Himeno: ‘Eddie gave me a task - to be the world's best back-rower’ Kazuki Himeno: ‘Eddie gave me a task - to be the world's best back-rower’
Search