Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Player ratings: Which England players impressed against Italy?

By Matt Merritt at York Community Stadium, York
YORK, ENGLAND - MARCH 23: Emma Sing of England scores her team's fifth try during the Guinness Women's Six Nations 2025 match between England and Italy at LNER Community Stadium on March 23, 2025 in York, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Today’s scoreline wasn’t quite as one-sided as perhaps the Red Roses might have expected against a defensively dogged Italy side, but John Mitchell’s charges nevertheless ran out as 38-5 winners to start their Six Nations campaign with a win.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tries from Mia Venner, Emily Scarratt, Claudia MacDonald, Amy Cokayne and Emma Sing ensured that, even with a line-up full of interesting picks from the Red Roses coaches, the reigning champions never had to get out of third gear.

Here’s RugbyPass’ take on how well every player performed.

1. Kelsey Clifford (off 51 min) 6/10
Showed her class in set piece as part of a front row who absolutely dominated in the scrum. Quiet around the park but defended well when called upon.

2. Amy Cokayne (off 60 min) 7.5
Perfectly pitched lineout throws, effective carrying and perfect placement to score England’s fifth try. Cokayne showed why she should be one of the first names on John Mitchell’s team sheet for big games.

3. Maud Muir (off 51 min) 6
Made some monstrous carries in the first half without ever hitting the heights of her performance in last week’s PWR final.

4. Rosie Galligan (off 60 min) 8
Phenomenal work rate in defence and relentless carrying led to what might be Galligan’s most complete performance in an England shirt. She’ll be frustrated to have knocked on while in the process of scoring, but the resulting penalty try was fair reward.

5. Lilli Ives Campion 6.5
Cool and considered, defensively very solid and a threat at the set piece. Early days in a Red Roses uniform, but seems the heir apparent to Abbie Ward.

ADVERTISEMENT

6. Zoe Aldcroft (c) 7
Does the things you don’t notice and does them perfectly. Never put a foot wrong and marshalled her team excellently.

7. Marlie Packer (vc) (off 55 min) 6.5
Gave away a penalty in the lead up to Italy opening their scoring and was a shadow of her usual ferocious self. Still put herself into every ruck and had her hand up for the ball, but without the results we have become so used to.

8. Maddie Feaunati 7.5
A huge threat in attack, seems like a natural eight and carries like someone born into the role. Needs to learn when to go and when she might be better to pass, but nonetheless a huge threat in attack and awarded BBC’s Player of the Match.

9. Lucy Packer (off 66 min) 7.5
A buzzing presence at every ruck or maul, Packer’s speed of ball was key to the Red Roses relentless early pressure. Always seemed to know the right pass to open up play.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

10. Helena Rowland (off 60 min) 5
Put her hand up as an option at fly half, but didn’t really do anything to make the shirt her own. Notably kicked into touch and nearly handed Italy a second try of the afternoon.

11. Claudia MacDonald 6.5
What a joy to see MacDonald, who has had a torrid time with neck injuries, return to the international stage and score a lovely try in the process.

12. Holly Aitchison 7.5
Notably caught offside early in the second half but did little else wrong. Released an inch-perfect up and under for MacDonald’s try and her distribution was just as accurate to set up Venner for the game’s first score. Worked hard defensively and came into the game when she moved to fly half.

13. Emily Scarratt 7
Not the dynamic carrying threat she once was, but still a danger, consistently opening up space with her kicking game, scoring a try and dictating the tempo of play.

14. Mia Venner (on 66 min) 7.5
Marked her second cap (and first start) almost immediately with a well-taken try to open England’s account. Continued to carry well and threaten with ball in hand. Came come close to scoring subsequent tries with frequent darting runs.

15. Emma Sing 8.5 – RUGBYPASS PLAYER OF THE MATCH
Rock solid under the high ball, dangerous when running and everywhere in defence. Sing might have been a little less accurate than her usual best off the tee, but will have given John Mitchell some food for thought with her performance. Finally scored a well-deserved try in the waning minutes of the game.

16. May Campbell (on 60 min) 6
Quiet, but did nothing wrong and threw well when called upon.

17. Hannah Botterman (on 51 min) 7
Carried hard from the moment she joined the fray. Seemed to put 60 minutes of energy in the 30 she had on the pitch.

18. Sarah Bern (on 51 min) 7
Showed why she is one of the best in the world with her carrying drawing so many blue shirts in every time. Carried like a juggernaut.

19. Abbie Ward (on 60 min) 6
A steadying presence to close out the game.

20. Sadia Kabeya (on 55 min) 7
Would have had England back on the scoresheet after a long 30 minutes plus stretch in the second half had the pass she received not been forward. Carried hard, defended fiercely and showed why she should be starting the big games.

21. Flo Robinson (on 66 min) 6
Showed a few glimpses of why she has been brought into the team. A steady debut to build on.

22. Jade Shekells (on 60 min) 6
Carried strongly, but made a couple of silly mistakes. Raw talent is there on debut, and will no doubt get another look in this tournament.

23. Ellie Kildunne (on 66 min) 6.5
Made a trademark run into space but was tackled off the ball with little effort by Azzurri opposition. Not on long enough to make an impression.

Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 tickets

The Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 is coming to England. Click here to buy tickets.

ADVERTISEMENT

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
B
BC 36 days ago

Sing - 6 out of 10, kicked some conversions and plodded down the wing a couple of times. Muir 8 out of 10, made a number of piercing runs and part of a dominant front row. Clifford 7.5 out of 10, effective around the park and scrummaged well. Venner - 6 out of 10, easy try but failed to convert other opportunities that Kildunne, Dow, Breach, MacDonald and Millie David would have eaten for breakfast. Shekells 7.5 out of 10, looked a very promising prospect at number 12. Perhaps I watched a different game?

C
Chris929 36 days ago

all fans and media people alike see what they want to and ratings are often just a quick reaction after a match,and many are often swayed by players they like or favour. I really dont see how sing according to this pundit put in a player of the match performance-she didnt really do much-solid but not spectacular. Venner played fine-she just does not have the extra pace likes of kildunne,dow,breach do and they would have scored a couple of the chances venner had but missed. there does seem to be a lot of gloucester fans who are very vocal online and cant seem to lay their club colours aside for england.every gloucester player should start according to them!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Eliza Galloway 36 minutes ago
Geoff Parling: An Englishman roasting the Lions?

Email: prowizardgilbertrecovery(@)  engineer.comWhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234Telegram: https://t.me/Pro_Wizard_Gilbert_RecoveryI never imagined I’d become a victim of a scam—especially in the fast-moving world of cryptocurrency. When I was offered a chance to appear on a popular crypto podcast, I was excited. It seemed like a golden opportunity to gain exposure, connect with industry professionals, and build credibility within the crypto community. The podcast appeared legitimate, complete with a sleek website, professional branding, glowing testimonials, and an active social media presence.After a few exchanges with the supposed host, I was asked to pay $9,500 to secure my spot on the show. Trusting the apparent professionalism of the platform, I went ahead with the payment. I envisioned the new doors this would open—partnerships, recognition, and new opportunities. But everything changed once the payment was made.Suddenly, all communication stopped. My emails and messages went unanswered. The podcast’s website vanished, and so did their social media presence. That’s when reality hit—I had been scammed.I was devastated. Angry, embarrassed, and desperate to find a solution, I began searching for help. That’s when I discovered PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. At first, I was skeptical, but with nothing left to lose, I decided to reach out.To my surprise, their team responded quickly and took my case seriously. Using advanced investigative tools and digital tracking techniques, they began tracing the scammer’s digital footprint. I watched as they worked tirelessly, putting the pieces together.Amazingly, PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY was able to recover 95% of my lost funds. The relief I felt was indescribable. Not only did I get back most of what I lost, but I also walked away with a hard-earned lesson about the importance of due diligence and caution in the digital world.While I wish I had never fallen into the trap, I’m incredibly thankful for the support and professionalism of PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. They didn’t just recover my money—they helped restore my peace of mind. I’m sharing my story in hopes that it helps others avoid the same mistake and encourages them to stay vigilant in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

44 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
James O'Connor, the Lions and the great club v country conundrum

Lol you need to shoot your editor for that headline, even I near skipped the article.


France simply need to go to a league format for the Brennus, that will shave two weekends of pointless knockout rugby from their season and raise the competitions standards and mystique no end.


The under age loophole is also a easy door to shut, just remove the lower age limit. WR simply never envisioned a day were teams would target people under the age of 17 or whatever it is now, but much like with Rassie and his use of subs bench, that day was obviously always going to come. I can’t remember how football does it, I think it’s the other way around with them, you can’t sign anyone younger than that but unions can’t stop 17 or 18 yo’s from leaving for a pro club if they want to. There is a transaction that takes place of a few hundred thousand for a normal average player. I’d prefer rugby to be stricter and just keep the union bodies signoff being required.


What really was their problem with Kite and co leaving though? Do we really need a game dominated by Internationals? I even think WR’s proposed calendar might be a bit too much, with at minimum 12 top tier games being played in the World Championship. I think 10 to 12, maybe any one player playing 10 of those 12 is the best way to think of it, for every international team is max, so that they can allow their domestic comps to shine if they want, and other nations like Japan and Fiji can, even some of the home nations maybe, and fill out their calendar with extra tours if they like them as a way to make money. As it is RA don’t have as good a pathway system, so they could simply buy back those players if they turn good. Are they worried they’ll be less likely to? We wait for baited breath for the new season to be laid out in front of us by WR.

It could impose sanctions on the Fédération Française de Rugby, but the body which runs the Top 14 and the ProD2, the Ligue Nationale de Rugby, is entirely independent.

It’s not independent at all. The LNR is a body under, and commissioned by, the FFR (and Government control) to mediate the clubs. FFR can simply install a new club competition if they don’t listen, then you’d see whether the players want to stay at any club who doesn’t tow the line and move to the new competition, as they obviously wouldn’t fall under the auspice of world rugby. They would be rebels, which is fine in and upon itself, but they would isolate themselves from the rest of the game and would need to be OK with that. I have no doubt whatsoever that clubs would have to and want to fall in line to remain part of the EPCR and French rugby. Probably even the last thing they would want is to compete with another French domestic competition that has all the advantages they don’t.


All those players would do good for a few seasons in France, especially the fringe ones, with thankfully zero risk of them being poached if they turn good. New Zealand had a turn at keeping all of it’s talent, and while it upticked the competitiveness of the Super Rugby teams into a total dominance of Australian and South African counterparts (who were suffering more heavily than most the other way at that stage), it didn’t have as positive an effect on the next step up as ensuring young talents development is not hindered does. Essentially NZR flooded the locate market with players but inevitably it didn’t think the local economy could sustain any more pro teams itself, so now we are seeing a normal amount of exodus for the availability of places again. Are Australia in exactly the same footing? I think so, finances where dicey for a while perhaps but I doubt they are putting money constraints on their contracting now. It’s purely about who leaves to open up opportunity.

58 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Are there 3 better fly-halves in Britain and Ireland... I don’t think so' 'Are there 3 better fly-halves in Britain and Ireland?'
Search