Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'A few sort of simple errors': Cane explains shock All Blacks loss

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

All Blacks skipper Sam Cane has blamed “a few simple errors” for his team’s latest damaging setback, Saturday’s demoralising 25-18 home defeat to Argentina in Christchurch. The captain would have felt his team had turned a massive corner when winning last time out away to the Springboks in Johannesburg, a victory that put an end to a run of five losses in six matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

That win resulted in New Zealand Rugby backing the under pressure Ian Foster as head coach, stating that he would remain in the job through to the 2023 World Cup finals in France. However, that decision will now come under further scrutiny after the Pumas ambushed the All Blacks by overcoming a 15-12 half-time deficit.

The shock All Blacks loss left Cane looking bewildered when he conducted his post-match flash TV interview just minutes after the final whistle. Asked at the start if he felt like it was a game of missed opportunities, he replied: “Yeah, it certainly felt, particularly in the first half, we were a lot more dominant in areas than we were able to show on the scoreboard.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“A lot of credit has to go to the Argentinian side for the way they stuck at it and eventually turned the tables and ended up putting us under a lot of pressure that second half. We didn’t respond the way that we wanted. We made a few sort of simple errors that we don’t really like to make in Test footy and they were good enough to get the win tonight.”

The suffocating Argentina defence more than played its part in fashioning the Orangetheory Stadium shock. “They are a really good defensive side,” continued Cane, who didn’t finish the match on the pitch as he was hooked shortly after conceding a penalty for tackling an opponent without the ball.

Related

“As I said earlier in the week they are probably one of the better defensive sides in the world. Look, we recycled the ball well enough but we weren’t able to convert it into points.”

It was next curiously put to Cane that there were a lot of positives on the night for the beaten All Blacks. “Particularly scrum and maul time and hence the reason we had a crack a couple of times, got pulled up on one or two technicalities.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Was it frustrating? “Yeah, it certainly felt like there wasn’t much rhythm or flow in the game, it was stop-start. There wasn’t much continuous play. But yeah, the footy is always different.”

You have another chop at it next week? “Yeah, we travel up to Hamilton tomorrow [Sunday] and we will have another crack. We have got to be better than we were tonight.”

Delighted Argentina skipper Julian Montoya said: “I’m very proud of our team. We worked very hard for this. We are really starting to believe in what we can do, that it is not just a magic moment like the first year. We just need to keep on working, We will enjoy this but we have got another game in seven days. Very, very proud, very, very happy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
M
Michael 848 days ago

As normal Cane’s leadership called into question - together with management team.

Anyone who watched this Ref in the 1st Test Boks vs Wales would see it would be a stop/start affair.

So what was the gameplan?

Richie went back to the AB style from earlier in year - not one attempt at a 50/20 - no tactical kicking to corners - instead one off running forwards bashing up & headless chicken lateral playing backs ( except on one occasion when Clarke scored, but never done again).

Cane says Pumas one of the best defensive teams - what BS - the Pumas have had a dismal record conceding tried over last 3 years. Admittedly now have a kiwi defence coach but you can hardly say they are great defensive team unless you play to their defence which we did.

Foster & coaching team were unable to change plan when things not working and Cane doesn’t have Rugby intelligence to change on the field

W
Willie 848 days ago

A few simple errors by players who should have been watching.
The aftermath of the false dawn of Ellis Pk.
Where is A Savea and the "Promised Land" ? "This is not a turning point but the start"?
Poorly coached, abysmally captained.
Call me when normal transmission resumes. I can tolerate losses, but not incompetence.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search