Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A fired-up Faf de Klerk spills over the advertising hoardings in scrap with Argentinian centre Moroni

(Source/RugbyPass)

Sale Sharks star scrumhalf Faf de Klerk and Argentinian Matias Moroni have been re-introduced with each other after the South African took exception to a cover tackle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pair of internationals usually met when the Springboks play the Pumas in The Rugby Championship, but found one another in the latest round of the Gallagher Premiership as Leicester hosted Sale.

After picking up a loose ball, Faf de Klerk was lassoed around the ankles by Moroni when the pair slid into touch. After the tackle, Moroni bounced to his feet and tried to step over de Klerk, which he took exception to.

Video Spacer

Currie Cup final press conference

Video Spacer

Currie Cup final press conference

Moroni was already tripping over as an enraged Faf chased the Leicester Tigers’ new centre and forced him into the advertising hoardings.

The Springbok then grabbed Moroni before the pair had to be separated by teammates. Fans were confused at de Klerk’s reaction, however the scrumhalf claimed he was pushed in the back to the sideline ref after the tussle.

The early scrap seemed to galvanise the visitors, who fought back from an 8-0 deficit to lead at half time after Sam James grabbed a long-range intercept try against the run of the play.

The Sharks were able to run away 25-15 winners after an AJ MacGinty cross-kick found Marland Yarde to extend the lead to 22-8 with 25 minutes remaining.

ADVERTISEMENT

The win lifted Sale into second on the Premiership ladder, but new coach Alex Sanders did not want his side getting carried away.

“Winning generally comes as an outcome of getting all the other bits right,” he said. 

“If we got some transference from how we trained, and what we talked about, even just glimpses of it and give us things to build upon and anchor all the hard work we’ve done, I’d have been happy.

“So to get the win on top of that is a bonus, and a good one. But let’s not get carried away, it’s just the start, it’s just a good start.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search