Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'A reckless act of foul play': Red-carded Adam Coleman cops a ban

An out-of-shot Adam Coleman is red-carded at Saracens (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)

Former Wallabies lock Adam Coleman will miss the next three London Irish matches following his red card in last Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership draw at Saracens. The 30-year-old forward, who won the last of his 38 Test caps in the 2019 World Cup quarter-final defeat to England, was sent off just 22 minutes into last weekend’s league game at StoneX Arena.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Coleman was deemed by referee Ian Tempest to have illegally made contact with the head of Jackson Wray and at his Tuesday night hearing, the Australian accepted the charge and was given a ban by an independent disciplinary panel comprising Gareth Graham with Leon Lloyd and Olly Kohn. 

He is free to play again on November 30, meaning he will miss the Premiership Cup games versus Northampton and Saracens as well as the Premiership match versus Harlequins. However, he could yet become available to face the defending league champions if he agrees to attend a tackle school that will knock a week off his suspension.      

Video Spacer

Wallabies coach Dave Rennie on his team’s indiscipline versus Scotland

Video Spacer

Wallabies coach Dave Rennie on his team’s indiscipline versus Scotland

In a written statement provided to the hearing, Coleman, who joined London Irish in 2019, explained: “As the nearest defender, I attempt to tackle Saracens’ No7. As I lower my height to make the tackle, he dynamically changes direction and accelerates towards me. This means my tackle happens earlier than I expected. 

“As I am rushed into the tackle, I fail to reduce my height as much as I intended. The impact of the collision forces me upwards and I make contact with the player’s head. I had no intention of hurting or making contact with Jackson Wray’s head. I apologise for the tackle which, due to the dynamic carry, I fail to reduce my height appropriately. 

“I am relieved that Jackson Wray was able to continue and did not suffer any injury. I pride myself on my excellent disciplinary record. Working on my tackle technique in training has always been an important part of my weekly preparation and I will ensure I continue to improve in this area.”

In their findings, the disciplinary panel concluded: “It was a reckless act of foul play. Whilst the player did attempt to lower his height, he did not lower it enough to make a safe tackle. He remained too upright, despite having a clear line of sight, and committed to a dominant tackle in that upright position. Under the head contact process, no mitigation was available to reduce this from a red card to a yellow card.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search