Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Aaron Mauger will eventually lose patience with Moana Pasifika's ill-discipline

Abraham Pole. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Moana Pasifika have defied expectations so far this year but there’s one simple area of the game that’s letting them down: their discipline.

ADVERTISEMENT

You could forgive the new boys of Super Rugby for not being as fit as their opposition, as well-drilled or as astute at game management, or even simply not as talented. It’s going to take some time for Moana Pasifika to get up to the same level as the teams who have been playing Super Rugby for years and years and being a little behind the eight-ball is frankly better than what should have been expected of the Pacific Islanders in their first year of competition.

But what’s made for frustrating viewing (and undoubtedly even more so for coach Aaron Mauger) is seeing Moana Pasifika hand their opposition possession and territory through ill-discipline -when it’s such an easy thing to get right.

Video Spacer

Dan Carter identifies the keys to success for the All Blacks at next year’s Rugby World Cup.

Video Spacer

Dan Carter identifies the keys to success for the All Blacks at next year’s Rugby World Cup.

Following almost every game that Moana Pasifika have played, Mauger has acknowledged that discipline has let the team down. He’s also been quick to point out that some of those mistakes come down to not necessarily being up to speed with the pace of the game at Super Rugby level.

“It’s a massive one for us, learning the pace of the game,” he said following the latest loss at the hands of the Highlanders. “Some of our boys are coming out of pretty much club rugby last year, or had a handful of Heartland or NPC games.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)

That means when professional referees get involved, less experienced players are more likely to cop penalties for things like not rolling away from contact quick enough. It’s not just understandable infractions such as that which have been a key component of Moana Pasifika’s game this year, however.

ADVERTISEMENT

Time and time again, players are getting pinged for late or high tackles or simply not retreating to the offside line – something which Mauger noted following Friday evening’s 20-point loss in Dunedin.

“[There were] a couple of technical [penalties] for us and then a couple of dumb ones: a couple of late shots put us under pressure, especially early on, which was a bit disappointing and obviously created the Highlanders’ first opportunity to score. Thought we played some really good footy other than that. Good lesson around that.”

It’s hard to truly gauge what the lesson will be for Moana Pasifika, however, because they’ve evidently not learned from their previous five encounters.

Mauger also noted that his men were well and truly prepared for the Highlanders to go to their lineout drive to accumulate penalties and points so it begs the question why Moana Pasifika were so quick to hand their opposition countless opportunities to do just that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

“We knew the Highlanders were gonna be strong around the set-piece,” Mauger said following the match. “They’ve been outstanding there all year. It’s been a real strength of theirs and they’ve gone to the maul and used their scrum really well. We knew that was gonna be a challenge.

“But I thought we actually fronted up reasonably well there. Just a couple of technical things that [would have] helped us stay in there a little bit longer and keep them out even more. Because they did well, the Highlanders, to execute the three they did get, and that ultimately was the difference.”

Moana Pasifika don’t necessarily have the cattle to stand up to the bigger teams at set-piece time and that’s not any fault of their own, but the obvious way of mitigating that weakness is by not gifting teams the chance to use the set-piece as a weapon.

You can’t simply wave your hand and expect knock-ons to disappear and kicks to not sail into touch, but conceding needless penalties is simply going to put your team under duress. If you’re not able to bring a maul down legally (or at least in a way that the referee isn’t going to ping you for), then you shouldn’t be constantly swimming up the sides and taking out the legs of opposition players or you will simply add to the misery and end up having to play with a disadvantage in numbers. Twice Moana Pasifika lost players to the bin in Friday’s defeat and neither of those were a result of simply not being up to the same standard as their opposition.

Moana Pasifika have shown that when they’re able to keep their discipline in check, they’re able to match it with the best teams in this competition. Unfortunately for Aaron Mauger, his inexperienced side have rarely shown that much composure to really put their opposition under pressure. Time and time again the head coach has lamented his team’s ill-discipline but it’s beginning to look like the issue is nothing to do with inexperience or not being up to the pace of matches and instead it’s simply down to players lacking the mentality needed to play rugby at the highest level of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 23 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search