Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Aaron Smith Achieves The Impossible, Convinces Ref To Change Mind

AARON SMITH HAS ACHIEVED WHAT MANY THOUGHT WAS IMPOSSIBLE. PHOTO: GETTY

People said it couldn’t be done. That it was impossible for even the most loud-mouthed rugby player to achieve. Last night, Aaron Smith proved the doubters wrong.

ADVERTISEMENT

Plaudits are flowing freely for Highlanders and All Black halfback Aaron Smith, who last night managed to pull off the most elusive feat in rugby union.

After exactly 83 minutes of play in his side’s clash against the Brumbies in Canberra on Friday night (Australia time), Smith successfully convinced Australian referee Angus Gardner to change his mind on a decision, sparking jubilant scenes among halfbacks and other loudmouth players everywhere.

Clinging to a six point lead, the Highlanders were being pressed hard when Brumbies flanker David Pocock attempted a pass that appeared to be knocked down by Patrick Osborne. After consultation with his assistant, Gardner ruled it was not an intentional knock on and should therefore lead to a scrum or line-out for the Brumbies. The quick-witted Smith then told Gardner the stoppage meant the end of the game – a call the whistleblower disagreed with at first.

 
superrugby_banner

 

Then, in a truly historic act of humility and self-awareness, Gardner uttered ‘oh yeah, it is!’ and blew time off.


WATCH: The amazing moment Aaron Smith convinced a ref to change his mind

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith immediately jumped for joy, as is his custom when he feels any emotion vaguely linked to happiness. He had more reason to celebrate than usual though. For one thing, it was redemption. Only moments before Smith had attempted one of the worst clearing kick attempts ever, handing the ball back to the Brumbies for one last assault on the Highlanders’ line.

Even more importantly, it was justification for a lifetime spent tirelessly yapping, entreating and haranguing. In that one brief exchange, Smith finally proved that arguing, pleading and claiming ‘we’re not playing tiddlywinks’ can actually work.

The All Black has kept quiet on the issue so far, using his Twitter time to continue extolling his deep love of Pokemon Go. But it is safe to assume this incident will inspire him to become the most persistent on-field talker in the history of rugby.

As for Gardner, even though he played his part in this monumental example of rugby reconciliation, he will not be able to look back on the game all that fondly. Earlier, he’d told Brumbies hooker Stephen Moore not to enter a “collapsed ruck”, which prompted the 100-test Wallaby to ask exactly what a collapsed ruck was.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, given that the Brumbies were the only Australian team left in Super Rugby, their defeat now hands Gardner the opportunity to be the sole representative from his country involved in the competition from now on.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search