Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Aaron Smith believes that All Blacks eligibility will change after the last two World Cups

Aaron Smith New Zealand performs the Haka before the Rugby World Cup France 2023 semi-final match between Argentina and New Zealand at Stade de France on October 20, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images)

Former All Blacks halfback and Test centurion Aaron Smith believes that the All Blacks eligibility rules will change in the next few years after two unsuccessful Rugby World Cup campaigns.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 35-year-old retired from international rugby at the conclusion of last year’s Rugby World Cup where New Zealand finished runners up after falling short by one point 12-11 in the final.

Smith believes that their is enough evidence from the 2019 and 2023 campaigns that justifies picking All Blacks from overseas, with a caveat.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

He wants to see a threshold similar to the ‘Giteau law’ used by Rugby Australia to pick Wallabies, which originally set the bar at 60 Tests.

“The last two World Cups show that maybe it isn’t the way,” Smith told Newstalk ZB’s Rugby Direct podcast.

“For our country, our market of Super Rugby and harnessing our talent, playing in New Zealand helps the game.

“When I was playing you had to be in New Zealand to be picked for the All Blacks.

“My only view would be there has to be a criteria for something, like if you’ve played eight years or 60 Tests. There needs to be a criteria so not all our young talent takes off.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Players could be eligible to go abroad and still give back to the country. That’s where I think it would be fair.”

“By no means do I want all our 21-year-old, 10-Test All Blacks taking off to Japan and not helping that next group come through,” he said.

The all-time great All Black pointed to the success of the Springboks at the last two Rugby World Cups who have picked a high number of their players from overseas.

In 2018 under pressure from the falling rand and amid a slump in the form of the national side, the change was made by SARU.

ADVERTISEMENT

Head coach Rassie Erasmus immediately began selecting players from Japan and Europe, holding alignment camps to get the squad on the same page.

Smith thought that there was “some gravy in that” decision but clarified he only saw a handful of players ever qualifying under new criteria.

“There has to be a group above a certain amount of Tests and time in the team that gives you the opportunity to earn more money and still play for the All Blacks like South Africa have done – they’re two-time champs in a row. There has to be some gravy in that.

“I think by this next World Cup there will be changes to that criteria.

“We’ve got enough smart people at the NZRU to come up with a criteria that not all our top talent leaves.

“You’re talking about four or five players who are deserving of that top end money and will still be wearing the black jersey. I’d say in the next few years there will be something that will move.”

 

“The microscope only really comes on in those World Cup years. The Bledisloe (Cup) is key every year and building our teams but you look at other nations – they build and peak at World Cups,” he added.

“If South Africa hasn’t shown that, then everyone is blind. They don’t do it pretty but they’ve done it. And they’ve done it twice now.

“You’ve got to applaud them on that. Talking to Pieter-Steph du Toit, my team-mate in Japan, hearing certain things about how Rassie [Erasmus] does things… It’s all calculated.

Watch the exclusive reveal-all episode of Walk the Talk with Ardie Savea as he chats to Jim Hamilton about the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now for free on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search