Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallabies coach believes All Blacks are ‘very capable of winning' World Cup

(Photo by Lionel Hahn/Getty Images)

Former Wallabies coach Robbie Deans believes the All Blacks are “very capable of winning” this year’s Rugby World Cup, but said the stars may align for the French.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ahead of the 10th instalment of the Rugby World Cup, there’s a fair bit of uncertainty about the how tournament may play out. The event has never been this competitive, and that’s great for the sport.

Many rugby fans around the world expect northern hemisphere heavyweights Ireland and France to challenge for the Webb Ellis Trophy, but they’ll have to rewrite history to do so.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

World No. 1 Ireland have never made it past the quarter-final stage of a Rugby World Cup. Looking back four years, many expected them to at least make the semis – but they lost to the All Blacks.

As for France, they’re widely considered to be the favourites going into this year’s event on home soil.

But the All Blacks can’t be forgotten or underestimated.

Following a disastrous start to last year’s international campaign, the men in black turned a corner to finish their end-of-season tour on a seven Test unbeaten run.

New Zealand appear to be building quite nicely ahead of the sports most prestigious event, and former Crusaders coach Robbie Deans believes they can “get the job done.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have ample talent to get the job done but obviously there’ll be elements of chance, elements of luck and that’s what captured the interest of everyone,” Deans told SENZ Mornings.

Related

“The All Blacks look very capable of winning it for sure.”

But again, Les Bleus are considered to be the favourites for a reason.

While their impressive winning streak was brought to an end during the Six Nations earlier this year, the threat that they pose hasn’t wavered at all.

Led by star halfback Antoine Dupont, France will go into the World Cup with plenty of confidence and belief.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The French do look formidable because they’ve got depth, playing at home and the fact that they’ve never won it, that factor is relevant,” Deans added.

“They’ve got the blend of depth, of belief, the chance of creating history, they’re playing at home – we’ve experienced that.

“The fact that they’ll believe the stars are aligned is critical for the psyche of the French; if the stars are aligned nothing will stop them.

“But they do have a history of getting in their own way as well, so how they manage the mind will be pivotal.”

The opening match of this year’s Rugby World Cup will pit two traditional rivals against one another.

New Zealand, who have never lost a pool match, will take on hosts France in Paris on September 8th.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 36 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search