Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Alex can do things no other back row in the country can'

(Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

Paul Gustard claims the youthful side he played in Harlequins’ 26-19 Champions Cup defeat against Clermont can provide the blueprint for the club going forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Quins already out of the qualification reckoning heading into their final Pool Three game, Gustard named a host of youngsters and saw his side battle gamely against an experienced Clermont outfit.

While the hosts ultimately came up short at the Stoop, Gustard believes Quins showed more than enough to suggest they are building towards a bright future.

“We have played against a side with 15 internationals and almost 400 caps today. I think we had four internationals in our squad,” Gustard said.

“It is the next step for us to start growing our own internationals again and have the next period where Harlequins are going to be a big force.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“Brett Herron and Niall Saunders are both 22. Tom Penny is a young lad, Luke Northmoore is 21 and so is Gabriel Ibitoye, so we have a really youthful team.”

Number eight Alex Dombrandt was the most impressive Quins player as he marked a man-of-the-match performance with a try.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 22-year-old was a force with the ball in hand and repeatedly broke the Clermont defensive line as he drove the home side forward.

He is in contention for an England call-up and did his chances of making the Six Nations squad, which will be announced on Monday, no harm with Eddie Jones in the crowd.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B7eVoQ0gDve/

Gustard refused to say whether he believes Dombrandt will make the cut, but was full of praise for a player he believes has a unique set of skills.

He said: “The kid runs lines from nowhere, has a feel for the game and a beautiful soft set of hands. It was another brilliant performance and Alex can do things no other back row in the country can.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We would like to hope he will be picked for England and it is important that we keep getting players into the international reckoning.”

While the performance provided plenty of positives for Gustard, he will have been frustrated to see Northmore limp off late on.

The centre scored a fine first-half try and Gustard admitted his injury was a blow to a Harlequins squad which is already carrying a number of walking wounded.

“He injured his ankle and it is a concern. We have five centres out injured and he will be the sixth,” Gustard said.

“We have Tom Penny in on injury dispensation today and other than that Luke is the only centre we have, which is a challenge.

“We keep getting these setbacks and that can make you or break you, but that is your choice.”

– AssociatedPress

Jim Hamilton discusses all the rugby news of the week, with particular focus on the Six Nations and Japanese league:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search