Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Alex Sanderson: ‘The game could die unless something dramatically changes’

Sale boss Alex Sanderson (Photo by Matthew Lewis/Getty Images for Sale Sharks)

Sale boss Alex Sanderson has described the proposed introduction of hybrid RFU contracts in England for Steve Borthwick’s leading players as a long-awaited, game-changing development that can help the sport survive in the long term.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Gallagher Premiership has been riddled with financial concerns since its inception, a shortfall exacerbated by the pandemic and the subsequent loss of three clubs – Worcester, Wasps and London Irish – last season, reducing the top flight from a 13-team tournament to 10 for 2023/24.

One of the solutions put forward to try and lessen the burden of high wages for leading players has been the introduction of a new hybrid contracting system whereby 25 of England’s players can have part of their salary subsidized by the RFU.

Video Spacer

Joe Simmonds on potential England selection

Video Spacer

Joe Simmonds on potential England selection

In return for these deals, where the RFU would pay a larger sum to clubs than the current £40,000 awarded for each player supplied to the elite player squad (EPS), England boss Borthwick would have more say on each player’s conditioning, game time and position at club level.

Rather than host mid-winter England mini-camps, Borthwick has visited all 10 Premiership clubs to meet a wider group of players to discuss their progress and his plans for the next period and he met with players, including the Curry twins, George Ford, Manu Tuilagi, Bevan Rodd and Jonny Hill, last month when he visited Manchester.

Related

Sale director of rugby Sanderson was delighted with the visit and he believes that hybrid contracting will be a positive step forward when the proposed deal is eventually rubberstamped. “I do because we want the lads, our young English players to play for England,” he said when asked by RugbyPass what his view was on the proposed new system.

“We want that to happen because it is their aspiration. What it does is take a bit of weight off us in terms of the salary cap because you get allowances for that and also in terms of their individual salaries because they would be guaranteed up to £160,000 a year I think so for many reasons it works for us, it helps us and it rewards those teams who have a larger contingent of English qualified players.”

ADVERTISEMENT

If hybrid contracting is expected to be such a good thing for English rugby, why isn’t it already in situ in a country that won its only Rugby World Cup way back in 2003?

“The Premiership, the PRL and the RFU have just seemingly been opposing forces, vying for time with the players, and it for the most part being a financial transaction as opposed to what is for the betterment of the game,” Sanderson replied.

“Over the last four years, since covid, there has been a coming together; the game could die unless something dramatically changes. Also, the agreement that has been in place has been eight years long so we have been skipping through large periods, almost decades worth of seasons, without the ability to change it because contracts and agreements have been in place.

“Now we have the opportunity to make radical changes and this is one, taking the best things from Ireland, from New Zealand, from all those centrally contracted unions; where you have got more influence over them [the players], they have a greater allegiance to country than club whereas at times it might have been the other way around in this country. We can hopefully close the gap a little bit just on that front.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think I’m of much influence, to be honest, there is very little by way of up management that I can do that has an effect but seemingly my understanding of the RFU – this is not a negative thing – because it is such a big organisation, 600 people work in it, steeped in tradition, and with people who are still there from the amateur period.

“It takes a long time for things that are not just said but are right to come to the fore and get actioned on. It has to go through a lot of people and a lot of conversations and at that point sometimes the opportunity and the momentum is gone to make a change.

“Seemingly there has been a bit of a shift recently and I can feel it in terms of my relationship with the senior coaches and long may that continue as we look to make the game better.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Colin 349 days ago

Love Alex Sanderson’s after match interviews, moments to enjoy!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search