Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Exeter's thrashing of Bristol came after 'special' request

By PA
Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images

Exeter head coach Ali Hepher admitted he could not be happier with his players after they produced the “special performance” he was looking for in their 50-14 demolition of Bristol.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wings Olly Woodburn and Jack Nowell both scored twice in the seven-try mauling at Ashton Gate with Luke Cowan-Dickie, Ruben Van Heerden and Richard Capstick also on the scoresheet as Exeter stormed to the top of the Premiership.

Toby Fricker and Will Capon scored converted tries in reply for Bristol but the Bears were comprehensively beaten in the end by a dominant Exeter team.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Hepher said: “I asked the boys for a special performance and I knew they were mentally right and I couldn’t be more pleased with the whole 23 of them.

“This season, we’ve built up good leads but have let sides back into it but there was none of that tonight as we kept working all the time.

“Big swings often take place around the half-time interval so we dug in very well and scrapped in the final five minutes of that first half to keep our line intact.

“In our game against Harlequins we switched off and became sloppy but we managed to handle really well tonight in the conditions and can get a lot better than that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Hepher paid tribute to two-try Woodburn and man of the match Jonny Gray.

He said: “Olly is working really hard and is in the best condition I have ever seen him. It is a lesson to everyone that if you get yourself into really good nick, there is no limit to what you can achieve.

“Jonny is a fantastic worker and we missed a bit of that last week in our defeat at Sale. He may not be the fastest but he reads the game really well and gets in some good positions close to the ball.”

It was a miserable night for Bristol before a home crowd of over 19,000 as it saw them equal the most points they have conceded in a Premiership match since 1997, when they lost 50-8 at Newcastle when their head coach Pat Lam was in the Falcons line-up.

Bristol cause against the Chiefs was not helped by losing Ellis Genge and Piers O’Conor to the sin-bin in either half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lam said: “We had our chances but we didn’t take them and it’s very difficult to win a match when you play 20 minutes with 14 men.

“It was just one of those nights, which was far from ideal, before a large home crowd. We just have to take it on the chin.

“It was a relentless effort from them in the second half and it took too much energy to keep them out.

“We dropped high balls and conceded a lot of penalties but we missed good chances when the score was 17-7 as we didn’t fire enough shots.”

Bristol captain Joe Joyce said: “I’m not sure what happened as it’s hard to believe.

“Against Exeter it’s normally a one-score game and the hardest thing is stopping them even though we know what’s coming.

“We had an advantage in the scrums and mauls but we still conceded 50 points.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 18 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

303 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Let's be real about these All Blacks Let's be real about these All Blacks
Search