Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks and Leinster sweating on significant Jordie Barrett injury

Jordie Barrrett of the New Zealand All Blacks during The Rugby Championship & Bledisloe Cup match between Australia Wallabies and New Zealand All Blacks at Accor Stadium on September 21, 2024 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Jordie Barrett’s availability for the second Bledisloe Cup test in Wellington is in serious doubt after suffering what appears to be an MCL injury to his left knee during the All Blacks’ 31-28 win over Australia in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett was forced off the field at halftime and All Blacks head coach Scott Robertson confirmed that his condition remains a concern.

It’s a headache for New Zealand and a major cause for concern for Irish province Leinster, who confirmed that they signed Barrett on a short-term deal back in April. He is due to start his stint at the URC heavyweights in December.

The 27-year-old was filmed in a knee brace at Sydney International Airport, suggesting he’ll be out of action for a spell.

“Sore and a scan tomorrow,” Robertson said when asked about Barrett’s injury. Barrett’s injury, which left him hobbling noticeably, raises the likelihood that the All Blacks will need to make further adjustments to their backline for the upcoming test.

Robertson did not provide a definitive timeline for Barrett’s return but suggested caution, even if the scan shows no severe damage.

“That’s right, we’ve got that period of time to get that month under the belt to get the knee to 100 per cent,” Robertson said. “And it gives us the opportunity to play a couple of other players.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This window of recovery time – with the All Blacks’ next match not until October 26 against Japan – should provide a chance for Barrett to rest and fully recover without being rushed back into action.

His absence in Wellington will force another reshuffle of the backline, continuing a pattern of injury-enforced changes throughout this Rugby Championship campaign.

“Sometimes when your hand’s forced, it can be a positive, the way it’s worked out with guys taking opportunities this year,” said Robertson.

Further scans are set to determine the extent of Barrett’s injury but it’ll certainly be worrying for Leo Cullen, Jacques Nienaber and the rest of the Leinster coaching ticket. Barrett and Springbok second-row RG Snyman were the Irish giants’ two mega-star signings over the summer and they look to end a barren run without silverware.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

12 Comments
T
Thomas K 89 days ago

A shame for Jordie but i think this is ultimately a good thing for the ABs. We need a more powerful carrier at 12 moving forward.

B
B 89 days ago

Billy Proctor should positively get a start on his home track, Sky Stadium.


Anyways if he ticks all the boxes he'll definitely be all good to go since playing against Fiji in San Diego many, many moons ago???.

E
EW 89 days ago

They've got David Havili waiting to fit in nicely.

G
GP 89 days ago

I agree, David Havilli is the man. He played well in last weeks Shield game. I hope they have the guts to pick him.

F
Forward pass 89 days ago

Hahahaha.... Havili isnt a test player. The guy is useless. ALB will be great, thanks.

G
GP 89 days ago

It is a real shame about Jordie Barrett , he was playing well. But Beauden can surely not be slotted back to fullback.Will Jordan was one of the AB's best at 15 on Saturday, a long with Cortez Ratima and Wallace Sititi. It has to be said that things got better up front when Tamaiti Williams came on, in the scrum and around the field. The guy is a force of nature.

G
GP 89 days ago

Agree with everything you said.

J
JWH 89 days ago

Yeah I was really impressed with him, a shame that de Groot underperformed though. Lomax has got to get off the field sooner. When Tosi got the ball he made some good carries.


That was what I expected from Will Jordan. That's the kind of thing he has been doing for years at fullback now, just had to get used to his role again. I think it will be difficult to play him at fullback again though with Jordie Barrett gone, as JB and DMac seem to be the main kickers in the squad.


Cortez Ratima incredible as usual. I never want to see TJP in an All Blacks Jersey again though. Noah Hotham should be given a shot, basically younger Cam Roigard.

U
Utiku Old Boy 89 days ago

“Sometimes when your hand’s forced, it can be a positive, the way it’s worked out with guys taking opportunities this year...” It would be more encouraging if selection, rather than injuries determined opportunities. The best form has been from players not rated "automatic selections" by the coaches.

J
JH 89 days ago

Exactly. All the positive changes for the All Blacks for several years now, have (for the most part) been injury enforced. When the younger players are finally put in there, they're standing up, unlike a lot of the senior players.


Unfortunately, Razor seems to be continuing the conservative unless it's forced upon him approach to everything.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search