Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks captain receives first ever men's World Cup final red card against South Africa

Sam Cane of New Zealand looks dejected after an initial yellow card was upgraded to a red card following a TMO review during the Rugby World Cup Final match between New Zealand and South Africa at Stade de France on October 28, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by David Ramos - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

All Blacks captain Sam Cane has become the first player to ever receive a red card in a World Cup final for a high tackle on South Africa centre Jesse Kriel.

ADVERTISEMENT

The flanker was shown a yellow card by referee Wayne Barnes on 27 minutes for making contact with the head of the South Africa outside centre, but it was upgraded to red a few minutes later, forcing the All Blacks to play over 50 minutes of the final with at least 14 players.

Cane’s back row teammate Shannon Frizell had already been yellow carded earlier in the half for a dangerous clear out of South Africa hooker Bongi Mbonambi, which forced the South African off the field with a knee injury.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber and Faf de Klerk explain the back-up plan for the Springboks if De Klerk goes down

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber and Faf de Klerk explain the back-up plan for the Springboks if De Klerk goes down

The All Blacks were trailing 9-3 when Cane was initially shown a yellow card, and it was upgraded just before Handre Pollard extended South Africa’s lead to 12-3. Even with a player down, New Zealand were able to claw a penalty back before hal-time, as the sides went in with the scores 12-6.

No8 Ardie Savea replaced Cane as captain for the remainder of the match.

Cane spoke in the build up to the match about getting the balance between the head and the heart right.

He said: “A lot of it comes down to our preparation. We’ve got a lot of experience in this squad and it would be silly not to tap into some of that. We’ve been really clear how we have built how we want to play as a team. In terms of head and strategy we’re in a good place and with that comes confidence. There will be a high level of emotion and intent to start the game well, there always is.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But we have played two knockout matches in a row and I trust we are in a good spot there. The boys have done a lot of physical and mental prep. Although it is a final, we just have to trust ourselves to go out there and play good footy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

186 Comments
C
Chris 417 days ago

I believe RugbyPass is owned by World Rugby, so the articles should be impartial now but the NZ bias is still very evident thanks to the likes of jokester Ben Smith (who blocked comments on a recent laughable article). On that matter RugbyOnslaught, also owned by RugbyPass, is also a complete disgrace like our friend Ben.

m
michael 417 days ago

It’s about time NZ’s illegal dangerous play gets called out. Just remember your dirty play cost your country the World Cup! What kind of fine or ban did he receive for that disgusting tackle? There number 6 should have been red carded in the first minute of the game!!!

k
kiwi 419 days ago

Congratulations to South Africa you weathered the black storm and came away victorious. Amazing defence throughout this tournament and worthy winners and Champions of the world for a record 4th time!!! Hats off to the Spring Boks green machine 🙌🏿🙌🏿 👍🏿
It was a bitter pill for our All Black team and supporters to swallow but we have to suck it up and give credit where credit is due. Never mind about blaming refs and dicks in a booth 😂 it’s over, it’s history and now it’s time to move on to a new All Black chapter that we should all be excited about! To our beloved All Black side who showed incredible character, courage and belief to keep pushing but were pipped at the post. You have nothing to be ashamed about it just wasn’t your day.
Over the past 120 plus years our team’s history is steeped in success (unmatched by any other team in the history of sport) and although we were beaten today, we will pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and be excited for what lies ahead. That’s what us Kiwis do. ✊🏿

M
Martin 419 days ago

I’m not a die-hard rugby fanatic. And yes it would have been nice if NZ had won. But on the day it was SA and their turn to be #1. Remember, it is only a game. Be grateful Hammas don't play rugby. That should help those with a skewd perspective on believing this game is so important, it's not.

M
Martin 419 days ago

It was accidental and it happens from time time. Why would the Captain deliberately risk that move? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Y
Y3mmxiii 419 days ago

Yes, because the intent was to cause the body injuries to the best team in the world.

j
jurgens 419 days ago

Yes yesssss luckily I'm from the Wit Kant 🤣🤣👍👍

B
Brett 419 days ago

I would Like to Say: New Zealand deserved to lose you guys missed 2 penalty kicks and in the world of professional Rugby….

South Africaaaaaaaaaaaa back to wins!!!!!!!!!!whoooohooooo

J
Johan 419 days ago

For me, the Cane incident was run of the game. (as was Kolisi and Kolby) The Frizell incident however was deliberate and not run of the game. Not only was he playing from illegal position he went in to injure. That was the red card

C
Christopher 419 days ago

We’re we watching the same game? It always amuses me how opposing supporters see the game form a different perspective, and believe it. A bit like that fellow Trump!
And, if you care to review the game, MM ‘s pass that resulted in the AB try was at least one metre forward! There is the view from the touchline that shows it clearly, if you can look at it objectively!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 12 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search