Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks player ratings vs Springboks | The Rugby Championship

Codie Taylor of the All Blacks tackled by Handre Pollard and Siya Kolisi (captain) of the Springboks during the Castle Lager Rugby Championship match between South Africa and New Zealand at DHL Stadium on September 07, 2024 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The All Blacks have lost The Freedom Cup with the Springboks winning another tense Test 18-12 at Cape Town’s DHL Stadium. It was a close battle all the way through but the world champions showed their class when it counted once again, whereas the visitors wasted some chances.

ADVERTISEMENT

Damian McKenzie had a chance to kick the All Blacks into the lead with less than 10 minutes to play but the playmaker sent the attempt wide left. The Boks were too good and made the All Blacks pay for that with their efforts to conclude the Test.

Here’s how the All Blacks rated.

Related

All Blacks player ratings

Starting XV

  1. Tamaiti Williams – 6

Credit to Tamaiti Williams, the All Blacks turned their scrum around and the youngster deserves some praise for that. New Zealand were outmuscled in the first three scrums but Williams showed some mental resilience to help turn the team’s fortunes around.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But other than that, it was a bit of a quiet night for Williams. The loosehead prop didn’t carry the ball a whole lot – while he was more impactful on the defensive side of the ball, it wasn’t a standout performance in that regard compared to the rest of the All Blacks.

  1. Codie Taylor – 8

Codie Taylor was one of the All Blacks’ best during last weekend’s 31-27 loss at Johannesburg’s Emirates Airline Park, and that was once again the case in Cape Town. Taylor set the tone early with some significant carries – running for 36 metres before the 15-minute mark. The one-time Rugby World Cup winner came very close to scoring the opener as a result, too.

Taylor left the field for a HIA midway through the opening 40, but after returning shortly after, the hooker didn’t skip a beat. The All Blacks enforcer was practically perfect throwing into the lineout, was solid on defence, and he also won a penalty at the breakdown in the 38th minute.

  1. Tyrel Lomax – 7

Tyrel Lomax is easily one of the best tighthead props in Test rugby at the moment. Lomax was quite brilliant during last weekend’s first Test against the Springboks and the front-rower was able to back that up at DHL Stadium.

Lomax gave away a scrum penalty early in the contest but, with the set-piece evening out a bit later on, the experienced tighthead deserves some praise for that. But away from the scrum, and without delving into Lomax’s influence in attack or around the breakdown, the All Black was especially impressive in defence once again – leading the way at half-time for tackles made.

But it wasn’t all sunshine and rainbows. Lomax was sent to the sin bin, under review, with seven minutes left – a massive moment in the context of this battle between two groups of titans.

Match Summary

2
Penalty Goals
4
2
Tries
0
1
Conversions
0
0
Drop Goals
0
122
Carries
121
6
Line Breaks
4
14
Turnovers Lost
16
4
Turnovers Won
10

  1. Scott Barrett (c) – 7

It was another hot and cold night for All Blacks captain Scott Barrett. New Zealand’s skipper didn’t carry the ball once throughout the opening 55 minutes of the Test, but he was able to secure a couple of turnovers and make some telling stops in defence. With about 10 minutes left to play, Barrett made one of the plays of the night by winning a lineout off the Springboks’ throw.

  1. Tupou Vaa’I – 7.5

The rapid improvement of Tupou Vaa’i in 2024 is one of the stories of the year for the All Blacks. At just 24 years of age, Vaa’i has emerged as a genuine leader within this All Blacks unit and it seems the lock has found a place in the starting side under Scott Roberton.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vaa’i seemed to have a presence about him during this Test in Cape Town. Whether it was in attack or defence, the second-rower used his big frame to the All Blacks’ advantage as they went toe-to-toe with the world champions. Great effort all round from Vaa’i.

  1. Wallace Sititi – 7.5

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about Wallace Sititi it’s that the backrower is made for Test rugby. It was a bit of a surprise to see Sititi named at blindside flanker ahead of this clash with the Boks – he’s only played two professional matches in that position before, and both were for North Harbour – but the youngster proved to be a worthy replacement for Ethan Blackadder.

Packing down opposite a Springboks backrow of Siya Kolisi, Pieter-Steph du Toit and Jasper Wiese, Sititi didn’t back down to the challenge – the All Black embraced it. Sititi was one of the All Blacks’ top tacklers during the first term, and the No. 6 was also a workhorse in attack. Expect to see a lot more of Wallace Sititi in the All Blacks’ First XV moving forward.

  1. Sam Cane – 6

It was a quiet night for former All Blacks captain Sam Cane. Cane was sniping around the breakdown, as per usual, and was also busy around the park but the flanker wasn’t able to have a significant impact beyond some moments of brilliance.

Cane won a penalty at the breakdown in the 24th minute. At that stage, the All Blacks were parked right up on their own try line but the backrower was rewarded for some clever work. Now, the Test veteran wasn’t poor but rather outplayed during periods of the Test.

  1. Ardie Savea – 6

It was another unusually quiet night for All Blacks enforcer Ardie Savea. Savea, who is the reigning World Rugby Player of the Year, carried the ball a handful of times for less than 15 metres. On the defensive side of the ball, Savea was one of the All Blacks’ best with the backrower making a noteworthy 14 stops.

Ruck Speed

0-3 secs
44%
55%
3-6 secs
40%
26%
6+ secs
7%
11%
93
Rucks Won
84

  1. Cortez Ratima – 6

This was always going to be a big Test for Cortez Ratima, When coach Scott Robertson named the All Blacks’ 23 on Thursday, Ratima had been given the nod at halfback – benching veteran TJ Perenara. In this fixture, Ratima failed to fire.

Without breaking the game open like we’ve seen in Super Rugby Pacific, Ratima was steady with both his passing and kicking game. The halfback helped drive the team around the park with a mostly composed performance, and later, Ratima won a penalty at the breakdown. That said, it was by no means a standout performance – it was somewhere in the okay to good range.

  1. Damian McKenzie – 5

It’s hard to know where to start with Damian McKenzie’s performance. McKenzie led the team around the park well in spurts but it was nothing like last week – it seemed impossible for the flyhalf to establish a sense of consistency against the Springboks’ defensive wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

McKenzie sent a few wasteful clearance kicks into the air and also had an off night from the goal-kicking tee. The playmaker shanked an attempt from about 55 metres out at one stage, and also missed what very well could’ve been the game-winner with less than 10 minutes to play.

  1. Mark Tele’a – 4

As much as Mark Tele’a tried, it just wasn’t his night. Tele’a popped up all around the park but struggled to make an impact against the Springboks, with the winger only carrying the ball four times for 13 metres. There was one moment to forget about 10 minutes into the contest, with the All Blacks’ No. 11 dropping the ball cold into touch.

  1. Jordie Barrett – 7.5

Jordie Barrett was once again one of the All Blacks’ best with the ball. Barrett carried the ball a handful of times for more than 45 metres – once again reinforcing the point that the All Black is one of the best No. 12s in the world at the moment. As for Barrett’s kicking game, there were some involvements to like and some wasteful attempts as well. Overall, another strong performance from the All Blacks’ inside centre.

  1. Rieko Ioane – 7

Whether or not Rieko Ioane should play at centre or the wing for the All Blacks is still a question that needs to be revisited. Ioane was good in the midfield but took things to an even better level after switching to the left edge during the second term. On the wing, Ioane made a couple of impressive bursts with the ball.

  1. Sevu Reece – 3

With Beauden Barrett dropping back to the bench, there was an opportunity for Sevu Reece to start in the No. 14 this week. It’s no secret that Reece is an exciting player when he gets going, but the winger just wasn’t on song against the Boks in Cape Town.

Reece was shown a yellow card in the 16th minute after taking out Willie le Roux in the air and the speedster never really recovered from there. The 27-year-old was beaten in the air a few times, missed some tackles, and seemed to be caught out of position once or twice, too.

  1. Will Jordan – 5

Will Jordan at fullback – it’s the selection All Blacks fans have been crying out for and coach Scott Robertson granted their wish on Thursday. Jordan was given the nod, and fans were rightfully eager to see what the 26-year-old could produce, and now we know. It was an off night for Jordan. The All Black has reached prolific try-scoring heights on the wing at Test level, but with the No. 15 on his back, he didn’t look like the same player at times.

Replacements

  1. Asafo Aumua – 6
  2. Ofa Tu’ungafasi – 5
  3. Fletcher Newell – N/A
  4. Sam Darry – N/A
  5. Luke Jacobson – 5
  6. TJ Perenara – 6
  7. Anton Lienert-Brown – 6.5
  8. Beauden Barrett – 5.5
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

141 Comments
N
NK 104 days ago

Why the tighthead prop is still on the field after the 70th minute is beyond me. Especially when the understudies are Newell and Tosi - very competent options off the bench.

I want to see what Ruben Love can do at fullback for this team.

C
CO 105 days ago

He thought he subbed on Darry? To deal with the Boks he should've gone with siix forward replacements and it's unforgivable they Darry didn't play his role. Razor is definitely the best coach NZ has but it's time to get the errors out of selection and substitutions. Emulating the Boks may be a hard to swallow pill but they are the standard and it's time for the Allblacks to have some humility and emulate them. Still very concerning all the fringe Crusaders in this team and Telea losing form. Havili should've been left at home for young talent, preferably in the forwards. The Allblacks are 4-0 through superior selection and coaching, the results are close but marginal players like Reece are too small to be effective in the air and yet keep getting chosen. The Wallabies tests are an opportunity to trial a bomb squad type structure, players knowing when they're coming on as a unit. The first two tests against England were very impressive but the forwards are struggling in the loose forwards with Cane and Savea with tiring, older legs and shouldn't still be going 80 minutes against the world number one. Congratulations Boks.

J
JW 102 days ago

Razors got a silly fixation with everyone playing dual positions so pointless substitutions like moving Rieko to the wing at the end of the game have to be allowed. Hey Razor, how about you just use the backs subs for you know, injuries!!!

J
JK 105 days ago

Sam Cane isn’t good enough. Too many average players means a mediocre team. Reiko is useless,Scott Barrett not far behind, and the clock is ticking..,

M
MB 105 days ago

Robertson tells us after every loss the boys let it slip, we need to work harder. really why don't the media ask the real coach why the team is losing. Maybe TJ Peranara knows the answers, after all he has so much knowledge about the game, even more than the referee. I

C
Chesterfield 92 days ago

TJ has a 85% winning record so he knows more than any of us fellah.

For comparison Justin Marshall was 75% so if anything nobody should listen to him.

L
LB 105 days ago

Maybe Robertson needs to do a sub change at 55ish mins since all blacks seem to fall off in last quarter. 5-10mins isn't really a lot of time to grow into the game if you are put on the 70th min. The benefit the bomb squad has is they know when they are coming on always around 45-55min mark so they can be mentally prepared to strike as soon as they come on. You don't want to make bench changes too prescriptive but you should allow time for players to get a feel of the game before that high pressure last 10-15 mins

S
SM 105 days ago

Dmac isn't good enough never has been at test level ,Reiko has to be moved to wing he sucks at center .

I
IS 105 days ago

Stats prove otherwise buddy dmac didn't do anything wrong in the weekend bar miss some kicks Scott barret isn't good enough for test level and never has he's constantly making mistakes constantly

B
BM 105 days ago

Think Dmac is good enough to be in this test team. It’s just that with the modern game shifting players around trying to figure out combinations sometimes takes the shine off a player’s natural ability and then they start to doubt themselves or they play to stay on the team so they’re not enterprising as they would be in their natural position. He reminds me a lot of Carlos Spencer - when he was on point he could shred the opposition to bits, but when he was off you just wanted to bury your head in the sand till the game was over.

Rieko should just stay on the wing. He’s more effective in space, although he carries well and is “filling” this gaping hole at centre for the team. AB’s need to look for another Tana Umaga or Ma’a Nonu type of player in the centres, until then they pose no threat to the opposition.

Last thought, NZ needs to do away with selecting only domestic players. The Boks have so much depth bc they ditched that system and started selecting even players who were playing abroad. Hence at lock they are 6-8 deep, same on the front row and now pretty much at any position. This team that won this weekend didn’t even have some of the combinations that were at the World Cup at yet the Boks managed to overcome. Imagine what the AB’s could réalisé with the same options. Just a thought. Overall, great test match. Much to improve on both teams.

D
DS 106 days ago

Considering Foster never lost the RC and now NZ is fighting it out for 3rd place with Aust the amount of stick Foster received from the rugby media and online comments looks poor judgement at best and two -faced hypocrisy at worst. Excuses are now being rolled out for Robertson by people who called Foster the worst coach in AB history!

S
SadersMan 106 days ago

Foster's win rate is 69.57%. Of the 25 ABs head coaches he ranks 20th =. These are facts not opinions.


I cringe to think how worse Foster's record would be without Ryan & Schmidt being added in mid 2022. Where Razor ends up is yet to be determined.


Also the TRC over the covid era was a mess. The Boks didn't play in 2020, & were severely affected by travel in 2021. They also sent 'B" teams to some tests in 2022 & 2023. Clearly prepping for RWC.

M
MR 106 days ago

Why do the A.Bs persist with using first fives taking the kicks( in this case McKenzie when you have Jordan Barrett on the park.

Stupid, stupid, stupid.I back Razor but come on, put that tradisional B.S in the trash and use the best man for the job( think John Ells, former Wallibies lock and goal kicker) !!!

S
SadersMan 106 days ago

Not quite. Richie Mounga & Jordie shared the conversions v IRE at RWC23 as I recall. And Jordie took long rangers. DMac had been dead-on leading into this test so he was clearly the best man for the job. As sometimes happens to the best of the best, he had an off day, missing two sitters & a long one.

D
DS 106 days ago

It used to be fullbacks. DMac had a 92% accuracy this year until yesterday and has been nailing the long kicks while Jordie missed a long one in the WC final so maybe that's the thinking?

S
SadersMan 106 days ago

Lomax gets downgraded to a 5 for essentially throwing the match away.


BB gets a 3 for botching both an overlap pass (yes, Le Roux got a dodgy yellow but not the point) & a chip kick. Negative impact.


TJ gets a 3 for too much motormouth distraction & for sending a falcon bullet straight to Scooters head with the ABs hot on attack.


Blah blah blah lol . . .


P.S. Ref was a 10/10

I
IS 105 days ago

Tj hasn't been good this season I think he's been quite poor and since he started running his mouth he's been worse I think Noah hotem should get a run over tj

T
Toaster 105 days ago

Razor played Lomax for 73 mins

An absolute travesty

He was also the teams equal top tackler with 15


Surely they would’ve noticed this and subbed him earlier?

Ofa on at 70

Newell on at 74

Aumua did 10 mins early then nothing

Darry nothing


I’m not a coach Razor but considering the forwards bench impact was lacking last week this was even worse

G
GM 106 days ago

Don't understand why Lomax, a tight-head, was kept on for 70 + minutes. Unheard of, particularly when you've a scrummaging tight-head (Newell) on the bench. Such a shame for a player who, with Taylor and Williams, had got the wood on the Bok scrum (after a wobbly start). But that was the game - Lomax gave away a scrum penalty against a fresh loosehead, then made a tired mistake and got yellow-carded. A red card for whoever was handling the bench.

There was a lot to like about what the ABs did in this series, but TJ, Sevu, Finau, have had their day. The ABs don't have the forward depth of the Boks and really missed Tuipolotu and De Groot. Vai'i was a revelation, but I wonder if Paddy had been there, Razor might have run Scooter at 6 and powered up our pygmy back row (full of hybrid 7s)? Scooter's getting turnovers, and high tackle count but needs to get more opportunities with ball in hand.

J
JD Kiwi 104 days ago

I think Scooter was on ruck clearing and we did much better there.


Patience with Finau, Kaino took years to mature. Doesn't mean to say that he shouldn't be dropped of course.

S
SadersMan 105 days ago

Good post. I'd like to hear from Jase Ryan about tight 5 bench strategy.

M
MM 105 days ago

Tuipolotu is and has always been a plodder.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 11 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search