Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks suffer injury blow ahead of clash against France

(Photo by Niall Carson/PA Images via Getty Images)

The All Blacks will be tasked with bouncing back from their stunning defeat to Ireland over the weekend without the services of midfielder Anton Lienert-Brown.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lienert-Brown left the field with a partial dislocated shoulder injury in the first half of his side’s 29-20 defeat at Aviva Stadium in Dublin yesterday.

The 26-year-old travelled to Paris with the All Blacks on Monday [NZT] ahead of this weekend’s season-ending test against France, but All Blacks head coach Ian Foster confirmed Lienert-Brown will play no part in that match.

Video Spacer

Why Morne Steyn will be remembered as one of the best Springboks ever | All Access

Video Spacer

Why Morne Steyn will be remembered as one of the best Springboks ever | All Access

“Anton has subluxed his shoulder so he’s in a sling, just as a precautionary, but he’ll be out of this week’s game,” Foster told reporters on Monday.

Lienert-Brown was joined in making an early exit from the match in the Irish capital by first-five Beauden Barrett, who never returned to action after failing a head injury assessment midway through the first half.

Foster said Barrett will continue to be monitored over the course of the next 48 hours as his fitness and availability is assessed for New Zealand’s final game of the year at the Stade de France.

Lienert-Brown’s season, though, has come to a premature end, and Foster will be forced to survey his options in search of a new No 12, who is likely to partner Rieko Ioane after his start at centre against Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

That leaves the All Blacks boss with inexperienced duo David Havili and Quinn Tupaea at his disposal.

Havili was the preferred second-five option in the early part of the season but has struggled to recapture his impressive form in the face of the rush defence he has come up against when playing the Springboks, Wales and Ireland.

Tupaea, meanwhile, would be presented with the biggest challenge of his young career if he is named to start against the French after having only played six times for the All Blacks since his test debut against Tonga in July.

The most significant international fixture he has been involved with to date was a cameo off the bench in his side’s win over the Springboks in Townsville, where he secured a breakdown penalty for Jordie Barrett to score the match-winning points from.

ADVERTISEMENT

A start against France, one of world rugby’s rising forces, would be a step up from that for Tupaea, but Foster may be swayed by his direct ball-carrying and effective offload game.

The other midfield option is Braydon Ennor, but the four-test international is viewed as more of a centre that can play wing rather than a genuine candidate to play at second-five.

Regardless of who he picks to fill the void in the No 12 jersey, Foster said he is pleased with the depth within his squad.

“I’m comfortable with the options,” Foster said. “We’ve been able to get through this tour really well from an injury perspective so it was disappointing to lose to players within that first half in the backs but that’s life, that’s test match rugby.

“Part of our job from a squad size is we’ve been able to build people and give opportunity so that when it’s their turn to step up they know a little bit about it.

“Whoever gets in that midfield this weekend they’ll be prepared and ready to go.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 7 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search